Class Notes (836,216)
Canada (509,690)
Sociology (3,253)
SOC210H1 (44)
Lecture 3

SOC210 Lecture 3.docx

4 Pages
Unlock Document

Baljit Nagra

SOC210: Ethnicity in Social Organization – Lecture 3 (Sept. 25) - Past academic journals are up – this year we have to cite the readings Important Elements to Ethnicity - Perceived common ancestry - The perception of a shared history of some sort - Shared symbols of peoplehood (kinship patterns, cultural practices, geographical concentration, religious affiliation, language) - Self consciousness (ethnic groups see themselves as distinct but the source may come from others) Social Constructionist Approach to Ethnicity - Social Ascription and Self Ascription - Ethnic identities can be fluid and situational. They vary across space and change across time. o i.e. German identity in North America. When they first came to N.A., they held onto a distinct, German identity. This changed starting from WWI when a stigma became associated with being German. And after WWII, less people identified as German and it became unacceptable to hold a German American identity. Some Germans changed their name. o Staring from the 1970s, there was resurgence in German ethnicity because the stigma weakened. In 1990s, Germans had the largest ancestry group. - Ethnic groups are actively involved in the construction and reconstruction of their identities but they do so in racialized circumstances. - The set of ethnic identities to choose from is limited by social and political factors. o i.e. “one drop rule” is was a formal practice made by a census. It had repercussions in people’s daily lives o i.e. an informal practice is when Black people enter society and are treated differently due to their race, so they feel isolated and categorized. Social Constructionist Approach to Ethnicity - Role that a given racial or ethnic identity plays in organizing society can vary - Thick category (an ethnic tie that organizes a great deal of social life at both an individual and collective action) - Thin category (an ethnic tie that organizes very little of social life and action) o i.e. South Africa prior to the 1990s, race determined who you married, where you lived, how you were treated by police, employment opportunities, and level of political power you had o i.e. Italian category is thin, it doesn’t determine who you are and what opportunities you have. It used to be a thick category when Italian immigrants first arrived. - Categories can change from thick to thin and vice versa Academic Journal Question 1. Do you think your ethnic or racial identity is thick or thin? How so? 2. Describe a time when you felt grouped into an ethnic/racial category that you did not belong into. Or describe a time where you wanted your ethnic identity to be recognized and it was not. How did this make you feel? 3. Describe how your ethnic identity is fluid. For instance, in which social situation do you feel more a part of a certain ethnic or racial group? In which social situations do you feel less a part of a certain ethnic or racial group? Has your ethnic identity changed over time? Empirical Case #2 - Asian American Pan ethnicity - Historical Study by Yen Le Espiritu - Panethnicity refers to the shifting of group identification from smaller to larger ethnic boundaries. - The category of “Asian” which is applied to Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Filipino members etc in North American society is a socially constructed. Therefore, Espiritu calls this Asian American Pan ethnicity. - In the beginning groups such as the Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, etc. were distinct groups - They engaged in ‘disidentification’ (the distancing of one group from another so as not to be mistaken and suffer the blame for the presumed misdeeds of that group) o They didn’t come together initially and wanted to be distinct o i.e. in late 19 century there were many racial stereotypes associated with the Chinese. When the Japanese came, they saw how the Chinese were treated and made a conscious decision to try to stay distinct. o Japanese thought they were superior to Chinese and were insulted when grouped with the Chinese. The Japanese believed in the stereotypes created for the Chinese. o The tables turned after WWII because the Japanese were the outsiders o Chinese people had buttons and signs to prove they weren’t Japanese o This disidentification was a self-defense mechanism - How did a collective Pan Asian identity emerge then? 1. Second generation Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Filipino immigrants shared a common identity associated with the United States. 2. The racial lumping of diverse Asian groups by government organizations and society in large. The second generation did not have the same opposition to being lumped together as previous generations. They didn’t carry the historical tension with them. 3. The political and social struggles of Asian Americans during the 1960s led them to realize that forming a coalition could better advance their economic and political interests 4. Shared history: Asian American Scholars reinterpreted Asian history to see what was common to all Asian Americans: o A record of violence against Asians, who were denied rights of citizenship, forbidden to own land, interned in relocation camps and forced to live in poverty-stricken area 5. Other factors: less residential and occupational segregation and protest against Vietnam War. Why is this study important? - Racialization: is the process by which groups come to be classified as races. It is the process by
More Less

Related notes for SOC210H1

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.