Class Notes (837,693)
Canada (510,397)
Sociology (3,261)
SOC212H1 (150)
Lecture 10

SOC212 Lecture 10 Notes.docx

4 Pages
200 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOC212H1
Professor
Candace Kruttschnitt
Semester
Fall

Description
SOC212 RADICAL CRIMINOLOGY November 21, 2012 Routine Activities:  Youth offenders in Saskatoon and Manitoba found some models of Chryslers were particularly easy to break into – increase in auto-theft resulted in policies to make these cars more protected  “Hot spots” – Weisburd & Sherman – Concentrating police activities in areas of concentrated crime o Increasing guardianship o Took 110 “hot spots”, split into 2 groups (experimental and control); 1 group got an increase in police presence and resulted in a reduction of offenses o Don’t know if displacement was temporary or permanent  Increasing surveillance cameras is an example of increasing guardianship  Controlling behavior with external policies and procedures  CRITICISM: Invasion of privacy; assumes all offenders are rational actors; ignores expressive/heat-of-the-moment crimes o Takes the motivated offender for granted (Hirschi – everyone is constantly motivated)  **From external research** crime is unaffected by social causes (i.e. poverty, inequality, unemployment, etc.) CONFLICT & RADICAL THEORIES  Represent a progressive movement of thought from how individuals are motivated and pushed into crime toward the political and economic causes of crime (from individualistic to societal level analyses) Conflict Theory:  Crime and delinquency is a result of class struggle; the ruling class: o Defines what crime is o Creates conditions that are conducive for lower class people to commit crime o Devise machinery (CJS) for controlling behavior  Socialized perspective in 60s & 70s exploded particularly in England o Individuals were disenchanted by the state of the Gov’t (ex. Watergate, etc.) o Crisis of legitimacy towards the gov’t  Rather than create a new theory, borrowed from conflict/Marxist approaches Most theories thus far have been “consensus” theories versus conflict theories Consensus framework:  stresses importance of understanding a phenomenon in its entirety; assumes that while not all aspects of society are integrated, everything gravitates towards equilibrium; change is gradual  Basic assumption of general consensus of moral values among citizens; delinquents are different in some way (i.e. undersocialized – Hirschi; part of a subculture – Sutherland) Conflict framework  Focus on importance of social change and exercise of power by limited number of individuals SOC212 RADICAL CRIMINOLOGY November 21, 2012  Society is held together by constraint, not consensus; majority values are held and enforced by the ruling class  If one is a delinquent, it is because it is in the best interest of the ruling class to define one as such  Distribution of power; process of legislation; selective label of criminal (common thief vs embezzler) Consensus Conflict Stability Question of change Society = well integrated A lot of dissention and conflict in society All elements of society have a function Elements contribute to change Value consensus Consensus based on coersion  Social disorganization theory, although argues that there are a lot of different value sets, it is still consensus because it assumes that this is dysfunctional (not the way it should be)  Marx – writing at the emergence of Western Capitalism; dialectic theory – weighing various theories o History is a reflection of constant conflict of social classes o Result of constant conflict = improvements; each step in the ladder had their own seeds of potential destruction o Capitalism = peak of the ladder; contains the weakness that will lead to a new form of government (i.e. socialism)  Bourgeoisie versus proletariats; working class is not paid what they deserve; ruling class profits from the struggles of the underclass o Workers become commodities; human dignity is sacrificed for the benefit of bourgeoisie  Socialism would be the ultimate form of economics  Two branches of critical criminology: o Instrumental Marxism: aimed at controlling the poor; comparing crime rates among the different classes; seek out biases in CJS; Jacobs & Britt – greater the disparity between classes = higher number of fatal police shootings  CJS is quick to take action when white, middle class woman gets victimized, less so for non-white lower class (Scott Peterson case); CJS selectively decides who gets more time and effort  Actions are instrumental to controlling the lower class o Structural Marxism: not just for upper class, but law are passed to ensure the long- term success of capitalism; interest in charting criminal law legislation; implementation of laws can be connected to the economic situation  Platt “Child Savers” – juvenile court system; less about benevolence  CRITICISM: doesn’t address variations within the classes o Comparing more socialized nations with Capitalistic ones – Switzerland and Japan are both very capitalistic, but have very low crime rates; suggests there is no link between capitalism and crime o DRM
More Less

Related notes for SOC212H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit