Class Notes (838,386)
Canada (510,872)
Sociology (3,262)
SOC250Y1 (69)

1. SOC250 Sept15-Oct20.docx

40 Pages
Unlock Document

Joseph Bryant

SOC250 Lecture 1 September 15, 2010 The social is cognitive, carried in our heads Epistemology What is the relation between the known and knower Objective knowledge, based on methods not opinions Social sciences- studying humans, relevant to oneself, the known (e.g. studying other people/opinions has no direct/objective access to that purported Transcendent reality (studying ourselves) Natural sciences- studies the other, the unknown external knowledge Religion is based on and creates and epistemological dualism or split: - religious believers claim the reality of the Divine or Transcendent, but social scientist/historians have ??no empirically verifiable or falsifiable resource. Epistemologically methodological atheism/agnosticism. - Faith statements i.e. claims of religious believers- arent fundamentally factual or empirical - They are declarative (God is love) making claims; performative (I have been saved by the lord); There is no God, but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger saying religious, tradition, you are performing the role- being a certain religion. - Emotive i.e. expressing feelings of awe, reverence, dependence, joy, etc. 1 Religious language is akin to poetry. - Evidence/proofs of faith statements are internal to each particular religion- they arent convincing to those believing in other traditions, nor to skeptics or atheists. 2 SOC250 Lecture 2 September 22, 2010 ONTOLOGYY- concerned with the nature of being, reality, or existence causally and constitutively (= what the world is and how it works) EPISTEMOLOGY- concerned with the nature of knowledge, how we know things other scientists are studying other things; in sociology we are studying ourselves, so that raises the intrusion of different types of beliefs in our scientific procedures. Weber said social sciences have verstehen (understanding); natural science knowledge = external. Our own psychological, social, historical experience gives us the opportunity to establish deeper understanding of the subject; also, our subject matter talks back to us Religion is based on a distinct ontology- the claim that there are supernatural beings or powers, or a super-sensible reality, an Absolute, Divine, or Transcendent realm that is ultimately primary & causally responsible for both the Natural world & the Social world OR Social science has no direct or objective access to that purported Transcendent reality; it cannot be visited for purposes of measurement of exanimation (unlike the realities of politics, art, war, etc.) 3 Religion is based on & creates an epistemological dualism or split: religion believers claim the reality of the Divine or Transcendent; but social scientists & historians have no ways of assessing or testing the legitimacy/accuracy of that belief. That is to say, for science, the divine or super natural is not empirically veritable or falsifiable. Epistemologically, faith statements, i.e. the claims of believers to spiritual or divine truths- are not fundamentally factual or empirical. Rather, they are essentially WHAT? PARABLE OF THE TWO EXPLORERS AND THE GARDEN 2 explorers come upon a beautiful garden; theistical explorer beliefs there must be a gardener (aka GOD); skeptical explorer believes the garden is the work of nature. The two try to catch the gardener (but fail to do so). This epistemological situation results in: (1) An insider-outsider polarity (believers + nonbelievers in other religions + traditions) (2) A split or polarity between subjective & objective ways of knowing- i.e. religion experience is sustained by cultivated faith in the claims of a tradition; those without the faith will experience or comprehend the true nature of that religiosity, or say the insiders. The dilemma or tension: social science cannot access that posited domain of the Divine or Transcendent yet believers claim their actions and experiences are desired from that source; social science accounts which attribute the actions or beliefs of believers to ____________ social and historical forces/factors will thus appear reductionist and superficial to the religion actors themselves. 4
More Less

Related notes for SOC250Y1

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.