Class Notes (839,242)
Canada (511,223)
Sociology (3,264)
SOC309Y1 (60)

Lecture #5- Oct 14.docx

16 Pages

Course Code
Robb Travers

This preview shows pages 1,2,3,4. Sign up to view the full 16 pages of the document.
SOC309Y1- AIDS, Neoliberalism & Responsibility: A New Moral Panic HIV/AIDS: Social Policies and Programs 1980s first moral panic that moralism was part of religious forms of moralism and condemnation (same sex and less accepting society) and a moralism creeping into public discourse with the idea we are solely responsible for our health as individuals. What shapes how we think about health? (2 key things) - Neoliberalism - Individualism o And the way it is entrenched in our society, not so much in US, Canada is more individualistic than great social welfare states of Scandinavian countries o Creeps up in everything we do and think about our health o Moral ways of looking at smokers, eating food presumed not good for you then the guilt number you do on yourself that creeps out of an individualistic notion of responsibility for our health. We used to think differently of what good health was. N and L go hand in hand. Neoliberalism refers to a historically-specific reemergence of economic liberalisms influence among economic scholars and policy-makers from the 1970s. The 70s were a time of 30 years of building of great welfare state (45, later war ending 2 total wars, housing/health care boom, national medi-care program, boom in Canadian economy) Most people were middle class, good paying service jobs that now today pay minimum wage did not exist back then. Our government was manufacturing which transformed to IT and health (knowledge based economy) Globalization accompanied neoliberalism - Neoliberalism is characterized by: (6 key points) o Market dominance free enterprise, the private world of capital and business o Small government (non-interventionist)- more efficient to privatize healthcare like US? 24% of every dollar spent for administrative cost o Tax reform- tax cuts will create jobs? No there is no utter proof. Only working class people apparently stimulate the economy by spending all money they have. Health and social program cuts suffered the most Tax cuts reduce government purse to pay for services o Trade liberalization o Deregulation of industry o Health/social program cuts - Responsibility placed on individual and family- moved from the state! - Smoking, diet and exercise are the 3 things we obsess about it our society. Can argue that not having poverty makes a society far healthier! - Another key thing behind neoliberalism= That societies are composed of autonomous individuals (producers and consumers) motivated chiefly or entirely by material or economic considerations- the notion we will play in the market to contribute to the health of the nation 4 Outcomes of Neoliberalism 1. Increased emphasis on encouraging labour market participation o 2009 data the last decile has become huge and filthy wish, the last one has turned into 30% and the middle has dipped (middle dipped) o = poor bigger percentage, middle disappearing, rich getting richer = SIMILAR TO THE UK large poor working class and small proportion of rich 2. A shift away from concepts of universality towards providing targeted benefits to populations designated as being low-income o Not everyone in neoliberal state is eligible for social welfare like we used to be o One time people used to get unemployment insurance more easily, welfare is more difficult to get now (CANADIAN WELFARE $571/month for single person- no credit cards- no savings account neoliberalism has put tight reigns on people to make poverty a self-fulfilling prophecy) 3. A downloading of the responsibility for the maintenance of social cohesion from the society to the individual (McKeen & Porter, 2003). o There used to be a different perception- people did not complain about tax cuts in the past- they believed great services were provided (healthcare) o Warren Buffet said congress is too friendly to billionaires where rich allowed to accumulate so much and all else suffer neoliberalism put great pressure on individuals and families o Worst neoliberal government 1995 Mike Harris Conservative government- common sense revolution policy- actually there was nothing sensible about it, the ycut social welfare rates 22% o These things have impact on society! 4. This places an astonishing amount of pressure on individuals and families. Individualism is the moral stance, political philosophy, or social outlook that stresses independence, self-reliance and individual liberty. Individualists promote the exercise of one's goals and desires, while opposing most external interference (government) with one's choices, whether by society, the state, or any other group or institution. - Individualism has played out in an interesting way in America since 1994 (Clinton) appointed wife as health care advisor to introduce comparable private health care. US private for profit, hospitals are businesses, corporations, business of making money while delivering health care- this is odd to Canadians - In the US- Hilary Clinton failed, backlash so intense, no way to allow government funded socialized medical system - Obama might have more luck with insurance introduced - Costs $5600/year for Canadian health care- 1200 per month in US compare that to high Canadian tax argument! - Individualism creped into US health care debate by using terms like product seeing healthcare as a consumer choice- we will sell you a product to protect your family Instead Canada sees it as a human right to have access to healthcare - US= great neo-liberal nation, taken things to the most extreme, different form of neo- liberalism more likely to be called neo-conservatism - Neo-liberal shift left to privatization of health concerns The old was worried about sanitation and germs, by 60s identification of germs and notion we become sick because of things that cause us to be ill, behavioral risk factors 80s HIV moved from us to our BEHAVIORS which fit well in neo-liberal framework society is no longer the field of operation for the state (i.e., people responsible for themselves) retraction of welfare state disease and health concerns privatized This neoliberal shift then has led to the privatization of disease concerns. Neo-liberal rhetoric: self-care self-reliance- not to rely on state too much responsible for self ...this (the welfare state) has been eclipsed by a more individualistic approach whose rhetoric speaks of the individual's responsibility to the self through healthy lifestyle choices. (Dodds, p. 140) we have ended up thinking that what we do, eat, exercise, - those things are what make us healthy or sick- this is the impact neo-liberalism has had- AIDS emerged into all of this discourse, high culpability disease (linked to unprotected sex with highly stigmatized people) linked to injection drug use, etc. so the rhetoric highly moralized from religious point of view blamed people for their individual action of say not using a condom- thus those infected tend to blame selves. - We know from years of evidence, social factors like poverty and inequality, make people sick! Exercising on the other hand may make us healthier - Example: every 1000 new cases of diabetes, every 1000 new cases of smoking, 1000 new HIV etc. you will see if you do a scatter plot you will see a disproportionately high amount of poor people thus health is taken away, not individual behaviours - Neo-liberal state made this get even worse deep forms of poverty are the worse outcome of neoliberalism HIV is the first disease to arrive in neo-liberal milieu affects already stigmatized groups in society acquired in ways that suggest behavioral culpability or responsibility high moral valence attached to the disease external and internal blame The creation of risk groups (and their corollary behaviours) allowed for the moralization of disease and the moralization of health behaviours Deborah Lupton talks about the New Public Health one driven by epidemiological data related to risk and behavioural risk reduction The old public health dealt with poverty, sanitation, and ensuring people had shelter, food and medications Sarah Nettleton talks about the holy trinity of the modern public health movement - exercise, diet and smoking Responsibility Discourse and HIV - At core of neoliberalism is individualism- individualism is at the core! - Idea that responsibility is central and essential of all health campaign in the world Some examples..
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1,2,3,4 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.