Class Notes (838,387)
Canada (510,873)
Sociology (3,262)
SOC313H1 (110)
Lecture

Lec 4 Jan 30th.pdf

4 Pages
86 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOC313H1
Professor
Candace Kruttschnitt
Semester
Winter

Description
which creates the image of female offenders as pathologically ill Jan 30 , 2013 SOC313 Lecture 4 - The traditional female roles, sexuality role critical - Different kinds of labels applied to women: unmarried, single, divorced … etc all different kinds that label women /All different kinds that classify women’s appearance.. - Fine line between what is acceptable or what is not acceptable for women/ All kinds of norms have social control implications for females. - Occupational norms: women are still concentrated in certain kinds of jobs. - Another important category in terms of deviant roles is what is considered appropriate deviant behaviours for women; any crime committed by women is considered deviant. - A lot of studies on women’s crime have been tended to focus on women’s biology. - Biological approach to female offending by Lombroso and Ferrero:  Interested in physiology/ do female offenders look different than normal people?  Biological explanation for female crimes: biological determinism to explain female offending.  Three factors: 1) how do we identify female offenders? 2) How can we explain the lower rate of female relative to male offending? 3) How do we explain the fact that women, when they are deviant, tend to be concentrated in certain offense categories? i.e. prostitution, welfare fraud, shoplifting etc…  With regard to the identification of the female offenders, L&F believed that by comparison to the “normal” women, they have masculine characteristics. L attributed this to the fact that women display fewer physical anomaly than men which is indicative of their closeness to lower/less differentiated forms of life. Women have fewer variations in their mental capacity, limited range of cognitive facilities which explains the concentration of female offence categories.  How was his work discredited? He analyzed those who were convicted, not wide rages of individuals. - But, the connections he drew between women and physiology and the nature instincts of crimes have been a recurring theme overtime. i.e. a lot of studies on hormones of female offenders such as PMS. A serious problem of establishing cause & effect relationships: i.e. “PMS causing crime” notion can be silly when the causal direction can be reversed. Psychological aspects - Sigmund Freud:  He was far more concerned with the question of how we become a social being: he argued that we start out as ID, and then we develop Ego, and Superego (conscious). He believed that we are born as an anti-social being.  Various forms of social  In his article in 1925 on some of the psychological consequences of anatomical distinction between sexes and in 1931, an article on female sexuality.  According to Freud, the castration complex (complex about not having a penus) was the main reason for females’ deviant behaviours. Women normally adjust to this complex (i.e. become a wife or a mother) which is the appropriate response.  Furthermore, virtually all scholarships assume that female criminality represents a departure from thrived sexual behaviours  This approach did not die out with Freud.  DMS (diagnostic manual statistics) done by American Psychic Associations defines sociopath and psychopaths, all kinds of disorders around criminal behaviour.  One of the new categories proposed were 1) self-defeating personality disorder (women who put others needs ahead of their own), 2) late luteal phase disphoric disorder (women with severe stress as an aspect of menstruation)  When these work were proposed, a sociologist responded by suggesting other disorder: Delusional dominating personality disorder characterized by an inability to drive the pleasure from doing things for others and a tendency to feel threatened by women who failed to disguise their intelligence.  Self-defeating personality disorder was never added to DMS. - These show a clear tendency to pathologize female offending - What do we know about female crime? When look at homicide rate, the sex ratio is 90 percent of males which has been remained constant over time. Do they differ in who they kill? Women are more likely to kill their partners. Men are most likely to kill acquaintances and then strangers whereas women are most likely to kill their partners (35 percent) and then children (10 percent). It is unusual for women to kill/harm strangers. Outside of the states, other countries show very similar patterns. - Non-lethal violence: sex difference in non-lethal violence is not as large as they are in homicide rate but males are still predominant. How do we explain this? Why are women less involved in violence?  It is part of being masculine to be violent for women.  Our expectation toward behaviour that influence the developmental outcomes.  Women being less involved in violence often times considered as being “normal”
More Less

Related notes for SOC313H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit