Class Notes (837,689)
Canada (510,396)
Sociology (3,261)
SOC355H1 (33)
Lecture 8

Lecture 8 Nov 2 Lecture.docx

7 Pages
Unlock Document

Alexandra Marin

SOC355Y1- LECTURE NOVEMBER 2, 2010 Last week you learned: • Knowing networks and core networks are important • Knowing networks are bigger than core networks. A lot bigger. • People meet people in settings where they do things with other people (foci). This is bound to create transitivity. • Foci are homogenous, so relationships created in foci are often homophilous. • Don’t be a lazy sample critic. Think about your critique. Today’s Outline • Reading research articles • Community and Networks • Core Network Size over time • Are networks shrinking? - What you should be taking back from articles… Wellman article: What is the conversation he is having: What is the Community Question? - About the idea of community and it is a question. - The question is: “How size and density of networks have changed, on the theoretical level it is about how community has changed with industrialization and modernization” - Good old days Wellman argues that they are kind of imaginary. They are what we think networks were like in some ideal past world. Example: grandparents… imagining things used to be different. To some extent it is imaginary but we do use it to contrast. - Scholars before Wellman (the conversation he is joining, what is he responding to?) – he is responding to whether communities are lost, saved or liberated. He argued that before scholars said community is lost. (These are his key concepts) - COMMUNITY LOST: dystopian view that once we have great communities of people around us, people know everyone and all get along. Neighbours are always there for you. But now (the lost part) no one talks to anyone, lock doors, neighbours do not talk to anyone… We no longer have relations with one another where there is no more community. Wellman argues this is the predominant argument going around scholars at one point. - COMMUNITY SAVED- said the opposite from lost, still talk to neighbours, everyone is fine, just like the good old days. - COMMUNITY LIBERATED- to understand you need to take a step backwards and understand what community is. What is community according to Wellman?  According to previous scholars, community was a neighbourhood area where people help out and get things done. That version is the version Wellman is arguing against in that it is very much built on place. People in the place do something for one another. Wellman does something dramatically different (not new anymore but) he says the point of community is not place but rather stuff is getting done for people, people are receiving support, community is who fills people’s needs. People who fill your needs might not be right there though, it would mean each of us have their own community. People who fill your needs are your community!  Personal community: those around you who provide you with support and fill your needs. There might be overlap with some people but mostly everyone has own needs. This is an ego-network! Each of our ego-network is our personal community according to Wellman. It is not about a particular place o This is a monumental change in the way we study community! o Takes a concept that existed in a long time in sociology and says well how can you think of this as a network! And if you think of it as a network what changes!?  Wellman’s article! All about COMMUNITY - We can start thinking of how they differ! The three above are ideal types of community: community lost saved and liberated - An ideal type is ideal not in the sense that it is the best type but it means it is an imaginary type, an idea type, and the ideal type is the one of that type that has all the characteristics of perfectly meeting the criteria of that type. Ex. Weber came up with study of Protestants. Held Benjamin Franklin as an ideal type Protestant of the time. Benjamin had all the characteristics he argued were intrinsic to an ideal Protestant. - What do these networks look like? Community Lost o Ego- will be small, sparse (opposite of dense), and there will not be a lot of help or support. People are isolated alone against the world- terrible Community Saved o Like the networks in the good old days. They were dense and had a lot of ties, lots of people and all knew one another. They were dense and multiplex- each person provides multiple types of social support. (Lends sugar, will help with children, helps fix roof, hang out, lend money etc.) Everyone knows everyone generally and people will provide support Community Liberated o There are ties with bridging, ties not all connected to one another There is mid-level of density, good number of ties (not huge though) Ties are specialized, example: friends from school help you understand something but do not drive you to the hospital in the middle of the night if you are sick. There are some bridges across clusters but different ties are specialized on different kinds of social support. People do get social support but only from particular people. - Wellman made this argument: literature takes the two ideas (lost and saved) and argue back and forth, he will redefine community as personal community and add the concept of community liberated. Then talks about how they would look like in idealized forms. Methods- According to Wellman (1969) - East York- working class neighbourhood, mostly white but not just but hugely Anglo. “”English-Irish, Scottish, Welsh” – various combinations back then. This was the data back then! (from U.K) - Wellman measures their networks. He does this by using name generators, interviewing. A name generator is a way of getting someone’s ego network and asking who provides social support. He looks at each network and asks how do they compare to the ideal types he drew, which one do they look most alike? - Wellman found in East York- a little saved and mostly liberated. He argues based on this that communities are mostly liberated and a little saved but no evidence for community lost. If you think of community as local neighbourhoods that would mean something different but Wellman defined them as networks providing support. McPherson Smith Lovin and Brashears. - What conversation are they joining? They are looking at how networks change over time. They talked about what networks were like in 1985 but they do not analyze data because it was already analyzed in Marsden 1987 which analyzed 1995. McPherson does this with 2004 data from the GSS which is a nationally representative sample using same questions.
More Less

Related notes for SOC355H1

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.