Class Notes (835,539)
Canada (509,225)
Sociology (3,252)
SOC366H1 (25)
Lecture

Lecture#7.docx

11 Pages
47 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOC366H1
Professor
Michael Reid
Semester
Fall

Description
Lecture #6 – Gender Wage Gap 6/7/2011 6:56:00 AM Major Contributors and Assessing Gender Wage Bias  Component of gender inequality  How we measure is very important  Sex segregation leads to wage gap Chart:  Left side: male and female segregation in jobs  Right side: median weekly earning for those jobs. Female dominated jobs come with low wages A. Major Contributors: B. Identifying the Effects of Gender What Matters  2 different measures  2 measures lead to different outcomes. Earnings usually seen in media – shows larger difference. o It is because males work more hours and more weeks. o Denominator i.e. hourly – a more pure measure  Wage gap today: 72 cents of dollars – 72%  Chart: the more education you have, the more you make. o FYFT – full year full time o At every education level there is a big gap – 70% o Human capital model doesn’t address why men make more.  Zhang – motherhood penalty: cost of motherhood is the highest among mothers with education – mothers vs. non-mothers = huge problem. At highest status of jobs – giving birth = labour market interruptions = biggest burn. 2. Occupation  what is relation between sex segregation and wages?  Red=smaller gaps, Blue = larger gaps.  In broad categories i.e. health care – feminized nature of nursing and doctor – huge gap. Comparing doctors to doctors also, they make less. Field of study in doctors – there is a filtering and 4% variance in income. Supply side: we are choosing it. But when comparing same job, same education – there is still a diff.  Occupations aggregate – nursing pulls wages down.  Service: women are in lower range – sell less quality items i.e. retail.  Gunderson: looked in same firm, same human capital in the same job – comparing apples to apples. There should be no difference but controlling all these variables, only 90-95% variance was explained. 5-10% is unexplained, only difference is gender.  Roth: ethnography – looked at security professionals on wallstreet – looked at dynamics between men and women. This is a service job – macho environment – language of war, competitive. When talking about dynamic environments – women made 29% less. 2 contributors o 1) Occupational norms - performance evaluations that are not formalized because job is dynamic so there is a lot of managerial discretion. o 2) Client-based occupation – a lot of client interactions happen outside work place in male environments – i.e. strip club, hunting. So you have problems interacting clients. Women have started golfing. Informal networking system – not there making connections, effects your pay.  Could be part of unexplained variance 3. Martial Status – and age  demographics matter  Table: earnings gap - % of what women make.  Single, vs. married vs. divorce  Single women should make the closest earnings to men because they are more like men – they are non-mothers, not married. They are similar to the ideal worker. This is true. o Single women in all categories are making 87%. Married women make less. o 25-34 category – huge gap – childbearing age. They would argue because of labour market interruption – they will have less experience. How much does that explain. Also male employer will assume she will leave and not get a promotion.  Zhang - hourly earnings, controlled for age. CA moms make 12% less than non-mothers. o Get more bang for your buck without kids o Gap increases with number of kids – 9% -1, 12% -2, 20% 3.  Economists argue: Because they are spending less time in labour market BUT they already controlled for this.  Childhood penalty or motherhood cost: status characteristics theory: motherhood in labour market acts like a status characteristics – salient category that matters in paid work context. Motherhood and on top of being female – so far from ideal worker with external commitment and have a female body. 4. Experience?Tenure/ and Hours Worked  Tenure – how long you’ve been doing that labour  Job tenure – how long you’ve been at that place  Across age groups – length in labour market – loss is huge. Women are making 90-95%. Gap keeps on widening. Gender pay gap gets wider, job tenure gets larger because it picks up in interruptions. Longer your labour market experience as women – the more likely you are to have more of a gap. Women are 4 years older than men that have same years of experience – plays into wages. Get bang for buck – for continual work – proxy of what a commited worker is – contruct of what a worker should be. More and more gaps = more female = less good of a worker.  Hours worked –men work more in overtime shift work – has to do with wage rate gap – annually there is a larger gap, hourly there is a smaller one. o When talking about hourly – a lot of service sector jobs. Look at industry. Overtime in shift work contributes to how much you make hourly. Women are not going out for beers but also less likely to work more hours because you have to go home. Overtime 1.5-2x more. o Shift work: in manufacturing work – midnight shifts pay 3x more men in factories. Hard for women to work over night.  Mobility structures are built in but who is available to do this work? Supply side theories – problematic – who is actually available in constrained construct. Variance Explained  Everything put together – should add up to 100% of your wages i.e. tenure, HC  Model 1 – HC, Model 2-location and HC, 4 – allof them o Total explained: when you add this up, how much is explained – a lot of it is unexplained. Usually 75%, underestimated. o Economists argue that HC model – if you invest in yourself and put in time etc. they add up to explain how much you make. Doesn’t bring gender into it. 25% should be unaccounted for. o Sociologists – there is discrimination. Gender and gender expectations, informal network – all these interactional forces also play a role. That is why it doesn’t add up. Demand side. o Economists rebuttal: you are not measuring them well enough. What are we measuring? o TEST: KEY CONTRIBUTORS ***** o 1) LABOR MARKET EXPERIENCE AND TENURE – NEED TO BE WORKING FYFT, STICK WITH EMPLOYER, NO INTERRUPTIONS. o 2) sex segregation – occupation, industry, location – indicates how much money you will make o 3) duties – decision making power etc. Characteristics of your actual job. When women move up and take job – have problem with real authority. They don’t get contr
More Less

Related notes for SOC366H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit