Class Notes (810,585)
Canada (494,162)
Sociology (3,207)
SOC483Y1 (20)
Lecture 5

Lecture 5 Oct 12.docx

6 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto St. George
Vanina Leschziner

Lecture 5– October 12, 2011 SOC483Y1– Mary Douglas and ClaudeLevi-Strauss What is useful about these readings? Today other than Durkheim, it is the first time we encounter readings talking about classifications, concepts and categorization. These are important concepts for the course over the year. - Why is it we have a need to classify? Both Douglas and Strauss want to tackle this question of why this tendency is there, why the need to classify? – this is a foundational approach. o Why do we classify o What leads us to classify things in certain ways? Both anthropologists – foundational figures – both structuralist anthropologists Strauss- first to study cultures in a structuralist way – similar to how Saussure understood language Levi-Strauss was French born in Belgium (1908-2009?) - The first to look at cultures in a different way - The Savage Mind 1962 published in France - Up till him, anthropologists studied cultures in 2 ways: o 1. Historical development o 2. Or like Durkheim in a functionalist way – things exist in a society because they serve a function (Mary Douglas does this) - L.S took a different view- he took a structuralist view - Like how Saussure understood language and understood words in relation to other words- that is how he understood a conceptual system - A culture is a system of symbolic communication according to L.S – resonates Saussure - Some examples- one major work traced a myth from Antarctica to south Africa- same structure would exist. He wrote about food, thought raw and cooked were 2 categories that existed in every food society and was an essential dichotomy and later turned it into a tripartite structure, not just raw and cooked, but rotten and cooked. (rotten= natural, cooked= human driven transformation) o Would go on to argue every society has the same structure - There was thus an attempt to get find similar structures in different groups Mary Douglas (1921born to British parents in Italy – 2007) - Clear connection to Durkheim! - Also a preoccupation with order and look at certain structures - Structures there only in so they serve a function - If we have notions of taboo, uncleanliness – it is because they serve a function of showing what is clean and not clean *Primitive Societies- unborn child seen as dangerous - Fear is manifested in different ways today – perhaps the topic of abortion may make this more clear, one side still unclear about whether the child is human – etc. there is ambiguity – emotional intensity - Religions having practices around women’s menstruation = considered a dangerous state - The marginalized or those in transition have power in terms of boundary maintenance because we need those people to show what the boundaries are – which side is good and which side is bad- marginal people serve function of showing boundaries, what is deviant, polluted and unclean. Thus the marginal have a very limited potential in allowing us to keep that boundary maintenance and to keep order. To keep order you must show people if they disrupt that order bad things will happen. - Classification is the main function that serves keeping symbolic boundary maintenance – are things dangerous beyond the fact they can disrupt order? – They are by in large dangerous for Douglas because they can disrupt order! – Ex: witchcraft and magic is dangerous because it can attack society!  Connection to Simmel’s Stranger – in order to maintain group boundaries you need a threat, thus the stranger occupies position which serves to maintain boundaries (source of functionality for society in terms of boundary maintenance and danger) – it is also a structuralist view in that the person in relation to the structure view- stranger is inside and outside – the stranger can only have that *special perspective- because only he is inside and outside - Disrupting order is the dangerous thing o Example- dirt is dangerous – sometimes used metaphorically, sometimes not. – Is there a fear of dirt? – - Maybe we are not so different from primitive people, maybe more similar than led to believe – despite scientific understandings - US – Canada- there is fear of dirt, not in metaphorical sense, government forces us to put anti-bacterial soap in public buildings – valid for societies, things may have shifted in form but there is still a lot of fear of dirt, just as there was before- validating Douglas Leviticus (Douglas) - What explains what animals are clean and what animals are unclean? = an ideal type of form of locomotion for each type of animal in the water, air, earth. - General theme- things that do not fall neatly into one category - Douglas argues against 2 typical explanations of Leviticus 1. Prescriptions about eating only had to do with a show of religious devotion. Simply to demonstrate you were a good religious person by following arbitrary prohibition 2. Typical explanation used by most people to this day, for example pigs not good to eat because they had dirty habits. o Douglas says some did not have pigs around and thus would not know they were dirty o Many other animals Jewish people could not eat – not just because they were dirty Wild game – not blessed from God – different than cattle which were protected by the Covenant – cattle are domesticated, blessed and protected. The wild game resembled cattle but was wild and unfit, unclean and bad for you - There is also an argument of different kinds of magic for people of different societies- what belongs in society and what belongs outside- social component in terms of social organization – cattle domesticated vs. wild game are on the wrong side of the boundary, not blessed by God, not protected With regards to theritualsof separation, dowe separate, purify and demarcate to impose orderon an inherently untidy experience (life)? Examples today? » Ex: rituals, transition rites mark moving from one stage to another – example graduation, marriage. This may be a way of separating different periods in our life course. » Marriage legitimizing sex and child-bearing – ritual of marriage brings all those things in a pure and clean form » Ex: Marriage in Mexico and proposed temporary expiry date- due to 50% divorce rate. Some Muslim marries for one day just to have clean sex. Levi-Strauss - Argument he makes: argues against functionalist understanding of culture, concepts, categorizations – in that things are their words because they serve a function because Strauss understands culture in terms of system of words and signs. Cultures are systems of symbolic communic
More Less

Related notes for SOC483Y1

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.