Lecture 11 Feb 28.docx

4 Pages
42 Views

Department
St. Michael's College Courses
Course Code
SMC219Y1
Professor
Francesco Guardiani

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Description
Lecture 11 SMC219- Monday February 28, 2011 Xerox pg. 73-84 - Postmodernism - Fact: we are living in this age of communication (electronic media) - We live in a “global village”- globalized environment, some implications or consequences - The content is not the same - Media are environmental agents, they change the contents, create another environment in which you must use different rules - Notion of postmodernism was a beginning of a fight (fighting to try and make some ideas comes across) - Computer- an essential part of life, education – implications: school based on books, books are not primary medium anymore – we are being taught something that is counter to what contemporary culture wants you to do (contradiction, speaking language not yours) - Why are we talking about this? Because we are talking about elements of life, our own contemporary environment, made of air, we breathe postmodernism Post modernity- contemporary cultural environment Culture is everything that is human - Definition* Guardiani’s definition is linked to media  Post modernity/ post modernism= electronic age, period of electronics, we know when it started, but do not know when it will finish First use of electromagnetism 1845 Pg. 73 Linda Hutcheon: wrote several books, most important book A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction (1988) - Her success was due to the fact that she was a very scrupulous surveyor of all the theories under postmodernism saying it is the age of acceptance, all free to tell own story, everyone can give own interpretation - Linda surveyed hundreds of opinions and gave her own: all positions are mostly acceptable but not satisfying for Guardiani because it does not clarify: why we speak of post-something? Because for her it was a post of modernism. - Post-modernity: that period after modernity - Something that comes after yesterday? - Linda’s definition is a “can of worms” – unclear, so many cultural entities seeming hard to put together even if they happen at the same time - Pg. 75 – Modernism: thing of the day, postmodernism: thing that comes after yesterday - Modernism is all these things, which we know have happened (impressionism, expressionism etc.) – but it is hard to understand if all put under that heading, so you postpone meaning… what does that teach you in terms of practical life? - Following Linda- she says postmodernism is not something that comes after, because modernism concaves and is a simple progression of modernism “the post of postmodernism suggests not an after but rather an extension of modernism” – but why Guardiani says would you go to Latin language and say it means extension rather than after when it clearly means after! – thus he sees it as a lack of accuracy in definition but she gains in overabundance of examples of discomfort, inability to contain contemporary life under one name - So what are all these expressions of post modernism? – descriptive rather than indicating cause Guardiani looks at Habermas, Jameson, Lyotard Lyotard looks at meta-narrative of progress, progress means exploitation of own nature, we go nuts if we continue with progress Late capitalism- the effect not cause of contemporary art Habermas- we must finish our work which started with Enlightenment Mistakes with interpretation? – Not many are willing to consider changes as big… we do not have these big apocalyptic changes so frequently according to Guardiani. Therefore we need to see this change as a big one, and see how big changes have taken place Criticism- first few pictures, know that we are talking about a cause that is more serious and profound than others which are merely descriptions, when we talk about media and electronic media we are looking at the cause Formal Cause: the cause which is the biggest, creates environments… Mega-effects? *Useful to turn to Northrop Frye, McLuhan gives big picture but not details Frye was a highly rational and analytical mind who liked the details - Look to Frye to understand big changes Look at primary concerns and secondary concerns Pg. 76: discussion of primary and secondary concerns* - Primary concerns: concerns with survival, life, food, water, air, ability to move wit
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit