9-Text.Criticism&Text.Ed.pdf

10 Pages
113 Views
Unlock Document

Department
St. Michael's College Courses
Course
SMC228H1
Professor
Lindsey Eckert
Semester
Fall

Description
November 15, 2011 Textual Criticism and Textual Editing Office Hours: Lindsey: Wednesdays 9:30-11:30 AM, Alumni Hall 303 Catherine: this Thursday 2-4 pm, Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library Catherine: this Thursday 5-7 pm, Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library - Endpapers - associated with binding, not text itself - Not part of collation statement --> describe in binding description - Book starts with title page! (Don’t count the paper at the beginning or end) - Endpapers -- often scrap paper that’s been re-used - Some books may have been bound together (i.e. someone bound a couple of his favorite books) Textual Editing - Digital editing has really grown and messed up traditional methods of editing and publishing Editions of Texts - In our contemporary historical moment, the availability of texts is unprecedented - Project Gutenberg, e-books of texts that are no longer in copyright, Google Books, print on demand books (on Amazon, if you want a rare/hard-to-find book, you can get someone to print it for you cheaply) - Quantity and access of not necessarily mean quality: pros and cons for buying an edited edition or a free one online - Without bibliography, textual editing cannot happen - scholars need to know they’re talking about the same text, that other people have access to the same edition - Without “quality” editions, literary criticism cannot happen effectively - What is a “quality” edition? - What does it mean you buy the Dover paperback vs. Penguin vs. Norton? - Intro, notes, etc. - Throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, much editing of literary work was based on aesthetic preferences - Editors sought to produce “good” texts: - E.g. Adding lines to Paradise Lost - Editing - has its own history; books as physical and textual objects evolved - Thomas Bowlder’s 4-volume The Family Shakespeare (1807) - “Many words and expressions occur which are of so indecent a nature as to render it highly desirable that stye should be erased” (vol. 1, page viii) - Cleaning up dirty bits in Shakespeare - British poet John Clare’s texts were heavily edited in his lifetime — sometimes with his approval and sometimes not - Peasant farmer, barely literate and self-taught; ignored grammar rules - His editors cleaned up his grammar so other people could understand - As he got more popular, he got mad at his editors for taking away parts of his poems - changing spelling and grammar, dirty poems - In a letter to his publisher in 1822: “grammer in learning is like Tyranny in government — confound the bitch and Ill never be her slave” - Usually his writing is unpunctuated = very hard to read - Should editors make poets like Clare a “slave” to grammar and normative spelling? Should we “rescue” him from his earlier editors? -Letters of John Clare. Ed. Mark Storey. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985 -Complete Poetry. Ed. Eric Robinson. OUP, 1984-2003 -Robinson’s idea: go back to the manuscript; leave everything unpunctuated -Some people say Robinson takes away from Clare’s poetry: it makes it unreadable, even though it’s the original -Are you going back to the author’s intentions? Who are you to say what Clare wanted? In his letters, he thanked the editor for cleaning up his work. Editions: Things to Consider -What qualifies as a “quality” edition or a useful edition depends on a number of factors: 1. Purpose 2. Audience 3. Other extant scholarly editions available 1. Purpose -Correct misunderstandings about text’s genesis -An edition of a text that has never been published -Text that accounts for all variants - tells you every change in every edition -Basic reading text with annotations 2. Audience -Who will use the edition? - The general public → simple - Students → looking for historical context for essays - Literary scholars → might want list of variants at the back -Textual historians 3. Other extant scholarly editions available -You don’t want to reinvent the wheel, unless it’s been done badly before -Is one type of edition available but not another type? -What else is out there? What do you need to complete edition? -Almost no text exists in one straightforward edition: almost any text anyone goes through to edit -- need lots of interpretation -Multiple manuscripts -Different editions published throughout an author’s life -Texts that exist in various (incomplete) states at the author’s death - which is “right”? -Texts that were heavily edited by an author’s publishers and editors - without or with the author’s consent -Variants invoiced into the text by compositors What is Textual Criticism? -“The study of the transmission of texts and the application of this to scholarly editing” (Williams and Abbott 167) ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ Textual criticism = ▯ ▯ ▯ material bibliography + book history circuit (Communications Circuit - Robert Darnton) -Part hard-core bibliography + social considerations - Elements within: reception of the text - of book -Textual editing - general term with many subdivisions Textual Editing Documentary Editing Critical Editing Facsimile Variorum Genetic theory of the copy-text Geneaological Historical-CriticalEditing -2 separate branches: documentary editing + critical editing -There’s some overlap between two “camps” -Author’s intentions: critical editing -Hard-core bibliographers viewing books as artifacts: documentary editing Documentary editing Critical Editing -Reproduces a manuscript -Often produces a new or printed text as a text, which combines
More Less

Related notes for SMC228H1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit