Class Notes (1,100,000)
CA (630,000)
UTSG (50,000)
WDW (300)
WDW101Y1 (300)
Lecture

WDW101Y1 Lecture Notes - Group Dynamics, Pepper Spray, Opencable Application Platform


Department
Woodsworth College Courses
Course Code
WDW101Y1
Professor
John Vervaeke

This preview shows pages 1-2. to view the full 8 pages of the document.
Policing: November 17, 2010
Going to look at policing protests and mass demonstrations. Cut down
the terrorism lecture.
9 to 5 pm.-send an e-mail if questions about the exam. (by woodsworth
college)
One of the best sources: Willem Dehintwrote about the Ipperwash
Inquiry-thoughtful analysis-in terms of starting point might be a
starting point wishing to start your topic on this paper. The title of the
paper is Public Order Policing in Canada and Analysis of Operation in
Recent High Stake Event.
Most protests are peaceful.
Protest policing:
This definition by Jerome Skolnick (1978): were talking about public
order policing; large scale events.
Jerome defines protest policing as the use of police authority and
capacity to establish a legitimate equilibrium between governmental
and societal, collective and individual, rights and interests in a mass
demonstration of grievance.
Policing involvement in controlling demonstrations is usually accepted.
Policing tactics and method that the police use are challenged and
criticized.
In terms of large scale public order events—police take three main
categories of tools with them to public order crisis:
1) The law
2) Communications (i.e. intelligence) and
3) Force
1) The law: Were making reference to all various legal tools the police
have at their disposal. Were talking about things like the criminal law,
civil statues, by-laws, things like emergency measures, things like
court injunctions, things like road closures, and many types of legal
tools. They are powerful. If think of permit of one should have before
staging a paradejust the fact you as a person want to organize a
demonstration you need to go to city and to get a permit. The law
imposes conditions; always, a way of helping policing so they can
successfully control the events under the terms the police are
comfortable with. –always come down to whether the police can
manage the event. With respect to the criminal law, police protests and
demonstrations---sometimes overly broad criminal laws—as we saw
during the G20 summitthe police can arrest and remove anyone in
www.notesolution.com

Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

breach of the peacethere is case law that holds that shouting through
a megaphone may trigger violation of the peace. There is also an event
of causing a disturbance—youll see that causing a disturbance
includes all kinds of things: youll see that causing a disturbance
includes things like shouting, screaming, fighting, singing, or using
insulting or obscene language.
In the APEC article, by Richard Erikson, the person was arrested on
saying stupid things.
While the playing field is quite large; there are constraints as well.
Constraints in Police tactics:
1) The police organization and culture: police are subjected ao all these
internal rules; subject to internal discipline: operate under much less
oversight.
2) Public Opinion: the police view their role and organization in terms
of a service. We said that this whole notion of community policing
really implicates the community. They have to be concerned and in
tune of public opinion. It is the public that pays for their salary.
3) Wider political culture: complicates the whole scenario. The wider
political culture can restrain a course of action or enable a course of
action. By political culture we say that Canada is a democracy-citizens
have constitutionally rights. All state officials are obligated to facilitate
this right. The wider political culture should serve as a constraint.
Technically, wider political culture asks as a check of what the police
can do. Erikson and Doyle talks about the wider cultureit becomes
an enable of a particular type of police conduct.
In London, England, there are 3 protests every week; and usually very
peaceful, protest in the UKall these policies being voted on in the
United Kingdom.
Living in democracy does not protect us from brutalness from the
police—seen in G20 summit this summer. We shouldnt be reassured
that we live in democracy—richard erikson and doyle say that we have
a tendancy that democracy is a zero sum game. You either have one or
you do not. There are times you have more democracy and sometimes
you have less. So the level of freedom is going to be dependent on the
political culture. The existing political culture is crucial into
influencing how police leadership is going to make decisions of how to
control a particular protest.
E.g. in great Britain, long term trend in less violence; nice long trend of
exchanges of police and the protests; when margarat thratcher—she
sends the message to the police chieffar more forecefully against
strikers.
www.notesolution.com
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

The result of this was unparallel brutality against strikers.
We can talk about this in context of Canada. Canadas police
responsive in changes in government and in policy---balance of crim
law and civil rights.
www.ipperwashingquiry.ca
Apec—all decisions made by prime minister had an impact on policing
strategies that were finally impacted. (Jean cretian at that time)
The policing literature have found good support for this view that
government and police leadership (who is the head of OPP?) that is
going to impact on the police style and kinds of valuevalues are going
to be pre-eminent of policing organization. The particular value system
is going to constrain or enable a particular approach. The police take a
particular strategy or tactical approach to them. It is going to widen or
narrow the range of options. The general literature has identified two
general strategies tactical strategies the police will use to the
management of protests.
1) Escalated conflict model:
oalso referred to as a control approach, a paramilitarized
approach (explicit chain of command and superior training-
youre going to send your special and tactic unit-the police
officers in this unit have superior training), or a hard hat
approach.
oOriented around a strong show of force-obvious willingness to
use force. It is characterized by the use of force as the routine
way of dealing with demonstrations. Gradually going to escalate
if public does not abide.
oStrict enforcement of the laws in all instances
oCould also involve the use of force as an alternative to making
arrests-arrests can occurno violation can actually occur.
oArrests are very vigorousmass arrests; they are often targeted
in trying to remove known agitators.
oCharter rights often ignored-generally ignored-very forceful type
of intervention-the point is to clear the protest site as fast as
possible.
2) Negotiated management model:
oA clever approach. It places the emphasis on places things like
liasonall about building liason (forcing of relationships of
protest leadership). It is consistent with community policing.
Things like community approach. Number of priority is to avoid
police force.
oalso referred as a service approach or soft hat approach
www.notesolution.com
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version