WDW300 February 9 2012.docx

7 views3 pages
19 Apr 2012
School
Course
Lecture 5 - February 9, 2012
February-09-12
15:12 PM
Beccaria and Bentham - From the Enlightenment to Modern Penology
History of criminal justice policy and criminal justice theory
-separation of powers/European ideology of legal positivism
-witch trials
-death penalty and public executions
-judicial torture
-from Beccaria; European legal positivism, problems of precedent and appeal
Broader Questions of history and theory
A range of possible approaches
-ideas - historical policy changes
-use of ideas purely opportunistic window-dressing (Marx) - look at underlying power relationships to
understand how public policy is actually made
-diffusion, interaction - complex relation between texts and policy
Beccaria 1738-1794- On Crimes and Punishments
Social Contract
-state of nature - similar or different to other theorists so far?
-join state of nature to get out of unsafe state of war through the establishment of laws to protect their
freedoms
-social contract is tied to the authority to punish
-general will; authority of punishment comes from the smallest portion possible of liberty given up, and
represents the will, an aggregate of private wills
-mutual obligation; it is in everybody's interest that the contracts useful to the greatest number should
be observed
-just and unjust punishments
-a crime is against the social contract and gives more advantage of liberty to one individual; individual
liberty and general liberty
The Laws
-role of the sovereign - represents society and 'is the depository of the current will of all citizens'
-give laws to the judges
-the role of the judge - not to interpret the law, but to judge whether it has been broken
Codification - laws must be available and clear because otherwise people must depend on others to
explain the laws to them, undermines system authority
-printed law makes the entre public the depository of the sacred laws
Seperation of Powers
-there needs to be a third party to pass judgement on whether a member has violated the social
contract. Otherwise, the nation would be divided into two parties; one, represented by the sovereign,
which alleges the violation of the contract and the other, the party of the accused, which denies it
Principles of Punishment
Purpose - to deter other men by fear from committing a similar crime
Proportionality - there should be only enough punishment to deter law-breaking
-three things that should not enter the calculation of proportionality
-sin; cannot bring God into equation, social status of the offender,
Promptness - speed of detention and trial is important because
-it is useful to punish the guilty quickly to associate the crime with the punishment
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 3 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get OneClass Notes+

Unlimited access to class notes and textbook notes.

YearlyBest Value
75% OFF
$8 USD/m
Monthly
$30 USD/m
You will be charged $96 USD upfront and auto renewed at the end of each cycle. You may cancel anytime under Payment Settings. For more information, see our Terms and Privacy.
Payments are encrypted using 256-bit SSL. Powered by Stripe.