WDW101Y1 Lecture : Lecture1

70 views5 pages

blueduck348

15 Mar 2011

School

UTSG

Department

Woodsworth College Courses

Course

WDW101Y1

Professor

David Davies

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Reflect societal values: define the limits of acceptable behaviour. Limited consensus of what should be crime i. e. possession of marijuana, abortion, homosexuality, prostitution: justify imprisonment/deprivation of liberty, protect society from harm. There may be things in the criminal code where you would wonder why the law exists i. e. water skiing at night. Interpret legislation, strike down unconstitutional legislation, apply legislation, determine guilt/innocence, impose sentence. Crime = prohibited act + potential for penal sanction. Distinguishing crime from other prohibited or regulated conduct which carries potential for penalties. Operating a hot dog stand without a license. After the criminal is convicted, they can be released on bail hearing or held in jail until their court date. Remand is an appearance/check in with the court to tell them any updates, not actual trial. Crimes vs. prohibited acts it is necessary for there to be a penal sanction (fine, charge etc. )

Related Questions

Hello Experts, here are the questions I would like to have some help with (context is Business Laws and Ethics):

What are the purposes of criminal law and how do they compare to the purposes of civil law? What would a society be like in which individuals and organizations were only subject to criminal liability and in which there was no civil liability for torts or violating contracts?

Thanks a lot!

Why is the Death Penalty Constitutional when, under the 8thAmendment to the U.S. Constitution the government inflicting"cruel and unusual punishment" is a violation of yourindividual rights?

	A.	Under the Due Process Clause of the 5th and 14th Amendment,neither the Federal, nor the State Governments can depriveindividuals of "life,liberty, or property"without Due Process of the Law. Which implies that theycan WITH Due Process.
	B.	The Eight Amendment guarantees the state application of crueland unusual punishment
	C.	The Ninth Amendment's guarantee that individuals have lessrights than the state or federal government when deterring violentcriminals to protect society for the greater good.
	D.	The Fifth Amendment's guarantee against self-incriminationprotects the government from the 8th Amendment provision
	E.	The Death Penalty is not Constitutional

roseyellowjacket451

6. (1 point) Tara lives in an economy where all adults either either work or go to university Those without a university education earn a salary of $40,000 per year. Those with a university education earn a salary of $65,000. University education lasts 3 years. Tuition is $30,000 per year, and Tara has access to interest-free student loans. Assume that Tara is an adult for 10 years. As an economist, give Tara advice on whether she should attend university before working. Bonus Question 1. (1 point) What, if anything, do you expect to happen to the num- ber of men who report having same-sex sexual orientation (or report being in a same-sex relationship or report having same-sex sexual desires) when HIV/AIDS becomes more preva- lent? What, if anything, do you expect to happen to the number of women who report having same-sex sexual orientation or report being in a same-sex relationship or report having same-sex sexual desires) when HIV/AIDS becomes more prevalent? Answer to these questions as an economist. Focus on explaining how and why changes in sexual behavior in response to HIV/AIDS becoming more prevalent might be different for men vs. women. Explanation should be 1-3 sentences. Bonus Question 2. (1 point) Following the murder-kidnapping of 12-year old Polly Klaas in 1993, California and a number of other states in the U.S. have passed so called three- strikes-laws. A three-strikes-law mandates that a person who commits a third criminal act to be jailed for the rest of his/her life without the possibility of parole. Importantly, these three-strikes-laws do not distinguish between more dangerous criminal acts such as murders and bank robberies and less dangerous crimes such as a smoking pot and shoplifting. Instead, anyone who is convicted of three criminal acts in total is to be jailed for the rest of his/her life following the third conviction. The intended effect of implementing such three-strikes-laws was to increase the penalties for crimes of any type in order to deter criminals from committing crimes. However, evidence suggests that the implementation of three-strikes-laws has increased the number of dangerous criminal acts (murders, bank robberies, etc) that have been committed. Why have the three-strikes-laws possibly led to an increase in the number of dangerous criminal acts? Explain (in 1-2 sentences).

WDW101Y1 Lecture : Lecture1

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

WDW101Y1 Lecture Notes - Controlled Drugs And Substances Act, Hybrid Offence, Narcotic Control Act

WDW101Y1 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Indictable Offence, Narcotic Control Act, Summary Offence

WDW101Y1 Study Guide - Criminal Code (Canada), Indictable Offence, Sylvia Fedoruk

Related Questions