WDW370H1 Lecture 2

6 Pages
125 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Woodsworth College Courses
Course
WDW101Y1
Professor
Bucerius
Semester
Winter

Description
1 WDW370H1 Youth Justice January 16, 2012 Lecture 2 The Social and Historical Context of Youth Crime - What is youth crime? o Depends on what reference point youre using to define it. If youre defining what it is today what resource would you use/what reference point would you start at? YCJA Criminal code is where you would find those kinds of behaviours o 13-17 year olds, prohibitions in criminal code apply to both adults and young people o Important to understand that that might be the case today but what about in 1970? What was legislation used then the JDA, certain behaviours in the JDA that youth can be convicted of and adults not truancy, promiscuity, etc (status offences). Because of a youths age they can be found guilty of things like skipping school, disobedience to parents, etc but with YOA those status offences were abolished. o Why do we have separate justice system for young people than we do for adults mostly demonstrated with penalty system seen as being more lenient than they are for adults but why? o 3 categories of age groups Children 12 < Youth 13-17 18+ o Why do these 3 categories exist? Whats the difference between a child and a youth? No over arching rule for if a 12 year old commits murder sometimes put into foster care, mental institutions, etc for the most part they are not treated the same way we treat young people who do the same thing and between 13-17 years of age. Were looking at levels of maturity, emotional and physical, moral reasoning and if person can understand consequences of their actions o By default in Canada we argue that 12 year olds by definition are not legally aware of the consequences of their actions. Thats why they are not treated criminally. o In Canada age ranges have varied over time. Cultural and historical factors affect what is considered legitimate and illegitimate, they are not fixed in stone (drinking age in Quebec vs. NY) o Should there be variability or clear uniform ages across the country? o When talking about youth and young offenders its not a category that hasnt changed over time, it will continue to change over time. - Role mass media plays in how youth crime is thought about/reacted to o Important set of institutions that shape way we as a society come to think about 1. Shapes what we think about nature of youth crime is all about, the characteristics of youth crime and 2. It also shapes way we respond to youth crime, what we think should be done. o Generally speaking if you were to do content analysis of mainstream press you would likely find that 1. Youth crime is on the rise often when youth crime is discussed in press its assumed to be bigger problem today than in the past also 2. Perceived to be more violent (gangs seen as more of a problem today, guns, and increasing gang violence), kids seen as doing things that are more violent in comparison to the past, also, 3. Compared to the past there are more females involved in crime. Often when you get discussions of these things you get explanations as to why this is happening violent video games, change in gender roles, immigration (for increased gangs)2 o Belief in facts o Why this is happening o What to do? If facts are seen as being true, logically what needs to be done to fix the problem? Law and Order which translates into tougher penalties more punitive, longer prison sentences, getting rid of mandatory minimums, house arrest, etc o Now say media reported that youth crime was going down, and sex differences in crime has remained relatively unchanged, kinds of kids that are involved in crime tend to be kids with problems (family problems), majority of kids age out of delinquency usually peaks at 17 and decreases over life course. What if the press covered all of this stuff? If the public received this message from the media what would the why question be? Would it even be asked and more interestingly, what to do? Create more social services for youth. In other words the way media frames crime affects how the public views things. o The media then plays an important part in how we view crime but it doesnt just work in an extreme way where people become all fearing of crime. Most peoples fear of crime is linked to their own experiences, experiences of their family, or experiences of other people they know. Its not that closely linked to how much TV they watch. It might affect how you think the problems should be resolved but not much impact on your fear of crime. o A lot of our understanding on youth crime is based on tradition, common sense, and claims makers such as police. The so-called experts really have a bearing and shapes how we think about crime. o Common sense powers our understanding even though it comes from who knows what its very powerful and the way we understand youth crime is based on this power of how the world work (nicorette example). o How can crime
More Less

Related notes for WDW101Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit