Youth Justice-Sept 17, 2012.doc

8 Pages
82 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Woodsworth College Courses
Course
WDW101Y1
Professor
William O' Grady
Semester
Fall

Description
Youth Justice -Sept 17, 2012 The social & Historical Context of Youth Justice -what is youth crime -role of mass media -objectivist v. constructionist perspectives -the origins of JDA -Why are young ppl treated differently? -Can youth be charged 12-18 yrs w/ something that adults can and vice versa? • Most crimes in crim code apply to both 12-18 yrs old and adults • But children under 12 cant be charged w/ murder • 3 categories , young offenders 12-18 , adults, and children • law applies equally to young offenders and adults • but why are they generally treated leniently nd • Rehabilitation-more emphasis on young youth should be given 2 chance –diminished criminal responsibility-better chance for rehabilitation • But why are is the age group from 12-18 yrs old? What accounts for these parameters? • Answer: Parameters are arbitrary. Not based on any kind of research. Age groups changed many times. Ex. JDA in Quebec applies to 18 yrs , in Alberta 16 yrs old. • Culture and context play a role in a creating parameters. Ex. In 1900-if charged w/ theftyouth end in adult court • JDA, YOA, YCJA(since 2003) ROLE of MASS MEDIA • Helps frame society understanding of youth crime • Media looks at Youth crime n 2 ways 1) News & commentary 2)- Drama (movies) • Media has been aware crime sells, media, news has been blurring the line w/ entertainment • Mass media is a business venture, so the way youth crime is depicted not so much to enlighten or inform, but to grab attention , grab viewers • That’s why mass media framing ,youth crime should be examined critically • Examle of how mass media depicts youth crime today • Causes/nature of problem • 1) problem of gangs • 2) Home Problemspoverty, poor parenting single parent families (females) • 3) Females are becoming more violent • 4) Race/Ethnicity/Immigration vs. Non Immigrants • What bout fallacious in Commentaryex. Danzig Shooting, police conference • Police conference said Galloway boys v. Malvern crew, was the cause of Danzig shooting, police presented that info as fact, and press asked no questionsbecause police are seen as ppl of authority • **police are often used as Primary definers- Press can get quick sotry from a person of authority w/out much investigation • **mass media indentifies the above as problems and identifies the (below)as solutions to Danzig ex. • increasing policing • increasing the severity of sentencing MASS MEDIA-history • pre-internet days, horizontal communication editors down to readers • Post Internet- vertical communication editor   Reader • Different framing for shaping the community view of crime • What if mass media was re-vamped and youth crime was defined as; • youth crime, majority is non violent • youth crime has little evidence is on the rise • little evidence, that female youth crime is on the rise • Many youth in the youth justice system are trouble, most did not grow up in stable househlold • ** so if crime was presented like the above, then the solutions would not be same as before • solutions would most likelty be-early intervention, **prevention would be seen as key thing, • **But politicians biggest interest is getting re-elected society wants immediate fix, which usually does not apply to meaningful solutions to youth crime • most solutions offered by the media, and adopted by politiciansis politically motivated, and not necessairtly effective for youths • Research fits into 2 categories , Objectivist vs. Contructionist perspectives • Objectivist perspectives— • Generally defines crime as being whats in the criminal code • Defined as uncritiziedd, seen as being real, and objective fact (facts in Statistics) • Crime is for the most part measured in a satistically accurate way in this view • Police are the experts in this field • **question as a reasearcher in this perspective is to figure out the causes of crimethen you can treat the problem or solve problembut you need a diagnosis first***this perspective is how most ppl in this country view crime in this country • CONTSRUCTIONIST PERSPECTIVE • Often asks the questions”Says who, and how do we know this?” • What is common sense? And who creates it • Reality vs. Socially constructed- Berger & Lukmann • The study of social problems, how they are constructed?, how do they appear, and are they based on relative risks • Why are some things not social problems? Who defines this? • You cant just take things for granted, that they are social problems. What is evidence of this? • STATUS OFFENCES • Ex. Breaking bail—ppl actually going to jail for breaking bail (which is not a criminal offence but breaking an administrative offense) • MORAL PANIC • 1970’s Stanley Cohen • This idea came in UK 2 youth groups MODS v. Rockers • One holiday in Brighton, there was a big brawl. Media covered event, as a huge event between mods and rockers w/ lots of violence • Garnerd much media atten
More Less

Related notes for WDW101Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit