PHIL 2270 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Deep Ecology, Environmental Ethics, Ecocentrism
14 Jun 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS
According to Keller (2010), environmental ethics is concerned with the following central
questions:
1) What are human beings?
2) What is nature?
3) How are human beings related to nature?
4) How should human beings be related to nature? Should we be exploiting the
environment for our needs? Should we be eating meat?
Who is more important; us or nature?
Anthropocentrism: only human beings have ‘intrinsic value’ and everything else
(animals, plants, abiota) has only ‘instrumental value’ for us.
Intrinsic value: x has value for its own sake as an end in itself
Instrumental value: x has value only as a means to an end
The implication of this view is that it is morally acceptable for humans to exploit nature
as we see fit & that our only moral obligations are to each other & not the environment.
That it’s okay to kill animals for food and fur, or take oil from the earth for cars and
machines.
1) Shallow ecology – only take action on the environment for the sake of human beings
as our obligations only extend to them or to future generations (Bacon, Mill, Kant, etc.)
Focuses on future of humanity.
2) Deep ecology – calls into question the focus on human beings rather than nature as
a whole (holism vs. individualism) – EX: J. Baird Callicott. Focuses on future of the world,
not just humans. Abandons anthropocentricism
Various approaches to environmental ethics arose from the deep ecology movement:
1) Hierarchical biocentrism – Acknowledges that other organisms besides humans
have intrinsic value. This still sees humans at the highest level of the value.
2) Psychocentrism - Not only humans but other animals such as higher primates
have self-awareness of themselves persisting through time. EX: chimpanzees can
recognize themselves in a mirror.
3) Egalitarian biocentrism – extends value to any organism that has goals
(teleology) even if it lacks consciousness. EX: Paul Taylor
4) Ecocentrism – parts accompany with other deep ecological ethical theories by
focusing not on various kinds of individuals (humans, animals, plants) Rather the
focus is on ecosystems as wholes – that ecosystems as wholes have intrinsic
value. EX: Naess argues that ecosystems are wholes consisting of related
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
