Class Notes (835,040)
Canada (508,887)
Lecture

TA Notes Week 11.docx

12 Pages
54 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Classical Studies
Course
Classical Studies 1000
Professor
Christopher Brown
Semester
Fall

Description
1 CS 1000 – Week 11 Lecture 1 November 18, 2013 Theoretical Approaches to the Problem of Definition of Myth – Continued from Week 10 Last Week: Theory 1 – all myths are about nature; Theory 2 – all myths are explanatory (aetiological) 3. Myths as Charters • This theory sees myths as charters and takes myth from the work of nature into human society. • All myths serve as founding documents for customs, institutions, and beliefs o There is an explanatory element but it is more practical and focuses on social institutions instead of nature. • In a traditional society, every custom or institution tends to be validated or confirmed by a myth. o Explains why we do what we do (ex. Why does a king always have to belong to a particular clan; why does that class possess the richest land?). o Myths help to explain and validate something within the society.  Divine participation in the founding of a particular institution. • This is somewhat a sub-species of Theory 2. • Are all myths of this kind? Probably not. 4. Structuralism • This is a different than the first 3. It is not so much a reductionist explanation of myth but a theoretical model for the interpretation of myth. • It was popular for a fairly long time. • This theory is associated with Claude Levi-Strauss and this movement began in the 60s into the 70s and 80s. Now it is passé but its influence is still detectable. o Levi-Strauss was not a Classicist but he was an anthropologist and he focused on certain populations in SouthAmerica. • Levi-Strauss argued that there was a primitive mind – this existed at the time before civilization. The primitive mind worked like certain types of computers in terms of binary opposites that seek mediation or reconciliation between the opposites (ex. Up and down then somewhere in the middle is the mediation). o All myths, then, are interested in working on these binary patterns in some way. o Levi-Strauss complicated this theory but early Greeks liked to think in terms of opposites (when something is referred to in Greek, its opposite usually is mentioned as well, usually to define things in relation to others). 2 • How does this work with myth?: The myth ofApollo’s marriage to Cyrene and the birth ofAristaeus o This is a story of a mythic ‘marriage’and Pindar tells this story.Apollo ‘marries’Cyrene who is the daughter of a king in northern Greece. Cyrene is unusual because she rejects the loom and traditional womens’pursuits (women in Greek myth are defined in their proximity to the loom). Cyrene likes to wrestle lions.Apollo sees her doing this and he is impressed and immediately he conceives a passion for her. He calls out a centaur named Chiron who convinces her to marryApollo and he carries to her North Africa (note: Cyrene is also a place and is the representation of the Greek colony in Africa called Cyrene). Cyrene andApollo have a child named Aristaeus, who becomes a pastoral god in NorthAfrica. o What does a structuralist do to this? – This story shows binary opposites inApollo (god of high culture and civilization) and Cyrene (wild). This shows culture vs. nature, civilized vs. wild, etc.  Strauss says that the binary mind must generate a mid-point. In this myth,Aristaeus is the mediation, he is a pastoral deity. His pastoral nature shows this mediation since it is somewhat civilized but still focuses on the wild. • Shows the structure of the myth, but often not the meaning of the myth. o The myth ofApollo and Cyrene, when looked through the structuralist view, doesn’t really say anything about its meaning. • This approach obliges us to efface some of the significant detail in certain aspects of myth. Structural analysis reduces figures to symbols and it makes these stories less interesting. 5. Psychological Theories • Traditional myths are also of interest to psychologists. In talking about Classical myths, Freud has been very influential. • There are two sets of Freudian takes on myth: o (1) Discussion of Oedipus – ushered in a revolution and is read by many non-specialists. • Freud discussed the myth of Oedipus in The Interpretation of Dreams (1900): Oedipus murdered his father and married his mother. o Oedipus complex: stems from the repression in early childhood from sexual feelings for the parent of the opposite and the desire to suppress the parent of the same sex. o This story tells us of a phenomenon of mind. For Freud, this was a phase of the typical individual and was a normal thing. In this myth, Freud argued that folktales, myths, sagas, even jokes can be related to dreams in terms of form and content. 3 • Freud came back to this myth later. Later in Totem and Taboo (1912-1913) he understood myths on a cultural level and “distorted wish dreams of entire nations, the dreams of early mankind”. • He said that the myth of Oedipus preserves the memory of real ‘Oedipal’events in the primitive horde, in which the sons of an oppressive father rose up against their oppressor and wanted to possess their women. • This approach is problematic. Something that happened in this pre-historic period is almost fossilized in this myth period. In the oral tradition, however, the telling and re-telling of myth is important for its survival. The ongoing shape and development of myth shows the relative importance of the myth (the psychological approach doesn’t take this into account). • Like Structuralism, this theory takes away the significance of the myth. The most conspicuous feature of the telling of the Oedipus myth is his ignorance of who these people were (something which is essential). o Tragedy shows individuals who commit crimes that would be unthinkable if the tragic character had been aware of it. o Crucial to Freud’s take is the knowing relationship and anxieties of the individual feeling Oedipal things. • Freud’s pupil, Carl Jung, proposed an influential theory. Jung argued that myth preserves basic patterns that are universal to the human mind. He thought that there are basic patterns and ideas that are universal to us (like deep programming to the human mind). o These ‘archetypes’recur throughout the world. o He thought that myths preserve these ‘archetypes’. • There is some truth to this (that there is something that binds us together as human beings) but the problem is that it requires us to scrape away the individuated detail surface to get at generalized patterns below the surface. o Myth, however, reflects its world and the context in which it was transmitted. o The individual circumstances of a people are reflected in the native traditions of myth. There are features of Greek myths that are present in other cultures’myths but there is a large component that is peculiar to Greek myth (ex. Heroes who, as a class, don’t occur in other comparable mythologies other than in Greece). o Despite our Greek programming, then, our history differs us in many ways (cultural, intellectual, etc.). 6. Ritual Theory of Myth • Connecting religion with myth is currently in fashion (closely associated with Walter Burkert who has written a series of important books that puts this theories on the map). • This theory sees an important connection between myth and ritual. o When looking at myth, we see that the gods are present. 4 • This theory says that there is often some link between the narrative structure of the myth and the pattern of action in the ritual. o When we think of a story, it is a sequence of actions. Ritual in Greek society is also a series of performed actions (‘ritual’in Greek = ta dromena ‘the things being done’) • The idea here is that there is some link between the stories and their actions and the patterns of ritual. • In the late 19 century, a ritual theory of myth was popular. At this point, it was believed that all myths were actually about the vegetative cycle in nature (i.e. growth and cultivation of food). All myths, then, should be read in light of this pattern. People then said that all myths were about the life cycle of a divine figure called the ‘year god’(eniautos daimon) and the specific myth reflects his pattern of death and rebirth. o This really doesn’t make sense but some people followed this. • Burkert brought this theory back and offered a better theory and he recognized that myth was a way of thinking about things for the Greeks and was a way about thinking of the implications of ritual. o To him, seeing how the Greeks used and told myths was of great importance. All of these theories have some aspects that are true for certain myths but not one of these theories is acceptable for all myths. Myth cannot be reduced to one function, idea, and aspect. • 399 BCE: TheAthenians executed Socrates. What follows is the rise of analytic philosophy.After his death, when the Greeks wanted to think about something seriously they used analytic philosophy (something that we use everyday). o Philosophy gives the Greeks a new set of tools (the old being myths). When the Greeks before 399 BCE wanted to think of something serious, he or she would turn to myth and tell a version of it.After 399 BCE, these stories are still told but they are less important. What we get instead is a treatise and discourse that uses philosophy and analysis. o In literature, there is less and less thought done in the form of myth but it is more for entertainment. • Myths are good tools to talk about profound things. Theseus and the Minotaur • This is an example that will help to explain these theories. • Theseus comes to the Minotaur (product of a union between the wife of Minos and a bull). The Minotaur lives beneath Minos’palace in a labyrinth. 5 The Heroic Cycle • This cycle incorporates the traditional kinds of myth and is also given its own form by the circumstances of its telling o Theseus was adopted byAthens as a culture hero and a founding figure  Athens didn’t have deep cultural roots that took it back to the BronzeAge (it came to prominence in theArchaic Period because it accommodated people from elsewhere). o Heroes could be used for political ends  telling stories such as this promote a political agenda • Theseus was from Troezen around the Saronic Gulf. There is a whole cycle of stories that situate him in his context (ex. Procrustes from last week). • He fought many monstrous villians in and aroundAthens • The Minotaur of Crete was his most famous adversary and it connects Theseus to Athens and Athenian history. • The Minotaur was fed with a regular offering of youths and maidens fromAthens (there are different versions of why this happened). Every year,Athens had to ship a group of young men and women to Crete. TheAthenians resented this tribute. At one point, acknowledged as the son of the king, Theseus sailed to Crete as a part of this tribute. • In Crete, the daughter of Minos,Ariadne, falls in love with him (a standard heroic motif). She gives Theseus the tools he needs to kill the Minotaur and survive (a thread of gold to find his way back out of the labyrinth and a luminous garland so he can see. • He successfully kills the Minotaur and finds his way back. He leaves Crete with Ariadne but left her in Naxos. He returned to become the king ofAthens (Ariadne ended up marrying Dionysus). Lecture 2 November 20, 2013 Theseus and the Minotaur Myth Continued • Slide: Roman sarcophagus- cupid figures with a trio of scenes in the middle. The first is Theseus about to enter the labyrinth, Theseus killing the Minotaur, and Theseus forgettingAriadne on the beach. o Why would get buried in something with this theme on it (bury a person in a box which had love all over it but it is showing forgetful love). The Ancient Greek World 6 • Slide: Map- Crete is where Minos and the Minotaur lived. • There is a clear connection between the story of Theseus and the Minoan world  traditional tales of the kind that make up myth can be told and retold but this traditional elements means that these stories are often marked by the circumstances of their telling and they take on a coloring of certain periods and certain time. o Myth seems to have been marked by the Bronze Age. This doesn’t meant that these are historical stories or ‘true’in any literal sense. o The basic shape of the story is consistent, it can be told any where and any time.As it is told in a particular moment, the teller colors it and
More Less

Related notes for Classical Studies 1000

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit