Class Notes (835,799)
Canada (509,410)
Economics (952)
Lecture 2

MOS 2275 Week 2 Lecture Notes

2 Pages
Unlock Document

Economics 2152A/B
Philip King

Week 2 Lecture Quebec’s Religious Freedom Law  Quebec is planning to pass a law that bans having or wearing large religious items for all government workers  Has been heavily attacked for: o Attack on religious freedom o Attack on especially minority religious groups (Seeks, Muslims, Jews)  Possibly a political strategy that this will increase their support from the Quebec people who are largely Christian  However, even though there is some of the above support, the value of religious freedom in Canada is so strong that the criticism will be so strong that they will have to back off. Law  What is the law? o Rules of golf are not a law. o Rules regarding weed is a law, but it is not enforced because it is not worth the police’s time. o Rules regarding abortion are a law, but the government was not capable of enforcing it in the court.  Machiavelli law: If law is not enforced, it is not a law. o Becomes more of a suggestion than a law o Ex. Justin Trudeau admitting to pot use  Natural law: Human laws are at best a natural o Ex. If a law made that things naturally move up, it is invalid. o Ex. If a government makes murder legal, it people will say it is not!  Utilitarian law: Law that makes the most people happiest is the law. o But who gets to decide what is best for society  Random law: Law is random and arbitrary o Ex. If you are in court for killing a person with drunk driving, the judge might have a friend who was killed by drunk driving in the past. Court will not be easy.  Definition of law must: o Have some enforcement o Have some good for society o Make sense in society  Should not only be interested in “what the law is” but also “what will the law be?” o Ex. The doctor who was sent to court Distinctions of law  Civil law: Anything that is not ‘criminal law’ o Often private parties. Government can be involved, but they act as a private entity o The winner must prove its case against “balance of probabilities” (that your probability of the set of events is more likely than the other)  Criminal law: o Always the state versus the accuser o The government must prove its case against “any reasonable doubt” o Partially because the costs are extremely high for the accuser. This reasonable doubt must be given to the worst of offenders, because when we don’t, nobody can be given reasonable doubt, and much more people will be wrongfully accused. o Release on technicality: If the police, prosecutor, etc did not do their job properly in any way, it will be resolved in favour of the accuser.  Public law: Always involves the government o Ex. Criminal law o Ex. Can be civil law  Private law: Between
More Less

Related notes for Economics 2152A/B

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.