Class Notes (839,464)
Canada (511,348)
Law (817)
Law 2101 (734)

tort law1

5 Pages

Course Code
Law 2101
Mysty Sybil Clapton

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Torts: Not just for DessertAnymore Lecture #1 February 4, 2014 What is a tort? Atort is a civil wrong (not a criminal act but a private wrong, between individuals and corporations) (but not a breach of contract) for which a plaintiff sues a defendant (alleged wrong doer) to obtain damages (money). • Awrong is committed against an individual, cant be someone else • Different then breach of contracts; which deal with pre existing obligations, in contrast torts deal with wrongs between complete strangers, car crash= tort of negligence, can be liable to other driver. • Not decided in advance, general obligations we all owe to society; duty to not purposely hurt each other • Contracts deal with obligations imposed upon everybody • Does not really care about reasons for why things were done Tort Law vs. criminal law • Tort action brought by plaintiff o Possible for a tort act to also be a criminal act (punching someone, can be assault (criminal) and battery (tort) • Seeks to redress a private wrong, opposed to criminal law which aims to punish and prevent society from doing the same thing • Goal is monetary compensation (damages), whereas in criminal law, money goes to the state • Defendant may be found ‘liable’, in criminal law it is ‘guilty’ • Lower burden of proof, only ‘on balance of probability’ whereas in criminal law, its ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ • In criminal law, there is a victim, but they are not the one charging the defendant, it is the state • In criminal law, police gather evidence BUT in tort law, there is no investigatory evidence behind you such as police, you are the one getting the evidence • Just because you are ‘liable’under tort law, you may not be ‘guilty beyond a reasonable doubt’crown may drop the case even if you are liable under tort Tort Law vs. Contract • Contract involves prior agreement between parties, with mutual obligations’what will happen in case one party breaks the contract • Tort actions often involve strangers who just happen to be brought together, no prior agreement • Tortious obligations are imposed by law (not to hurt each other) • Damages serve different purposes; in contract, damages are meant to carry out original obligations that you would have had, had the contract not been broken, forward- looking. In tort law, you want to restore party to previous, usually uninjured position, put them back to where they would have been in the first place Examples of Torts • Battery • False Imprisonment • Malicious Prosecution • Negligence • Defamation Goals of Tort Law: Why do people sue? • Compensation • Deterrence • Vindication • Punishment How well does tort law achieve these goals? Compensation • Primary purpose of tort law, especially for plaintiff, is to obtain monetary compensation. • Barriers (how well does tort law actually achieve monetary compensation) o Fault requirement- can only claim when there has been a wrong, cant claim compensation for an accident, or someplace where there is no fault o Expense of litigation- expensive, costs a lot to hire lawyer, often drags on for years, have to pay lawyer for a long time before actually receiving compensation o Defendant may not have money- can point to someone at fault, but if they can not pay, what is the point of suing? o Embarrassment- perhaps it is sexual in nature, don’t want to talk about it, or if a plastic surgery goes wrong. o Insufficient evidence- may not have enough resources to find enough evidence o Disruptive of relationships- if caused by someone close to you, it was because of negligence, not going to want to bring a tort claim Deterrence- laws ability to discourage defendant and other people from committing the same wrong • Tort law aims to deter defendants from engaging in same behaviour again • Depends on swiftness, certainty and severity of penalty o Takes quite a bit of time o Not certain you will get comoensation o Penalties can be severe, but again, not usually defendant actually paying • Problem: tort law may impose severe penalties, but is neither swift nor certain • Problem: hard to deter negligence (carelessness, people aren’t thinking about), hard to deter people from being careless, for example, touching radio in car, nor purposely looking away from road. Manufacturers have to be careful about this Punishment • Historically important, but has declined in importance with growth of criminal law system. Not usually associated with punishment like criminal law • Possibility of “punitive damages” – rarely awarded; amount above and beyond what is necessary to compensate victim. For example, enough money to cover medical care and extra money on top of that. Rare in Canada. • Suggests some moral blameworthiness on defendants behalf, can be important for intentional torts, but not negligence. • Defendant is typically not the one to feel the brunt of punishment, often employer or insurance Vindication • Historically important with respect to property • Nominal damages may still be available, but are rarely worth pursuing • May have some value in defamation- sometimes people want
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.