Class Notes (809,631)
Canada (493,758)
Philosophy (1,284)

Class 2 Answers.docx

2 Pages
Unlock Document

Western University
Philosophy 2080
James Hildebrand

Class 2 Answers Answers for Questions for Class 2 1. In the Palsgraph v Long Island Case, who do you think would be liable? Most obvious and direct: the person carrying the explosive package. Possibly the vendor and / or manufacturer of the fireworks who let this maniac carry them in a public place in a manner in which they could explode. 2. Why didn’t the plaintiff sue that person? As far as the package guy is concerned, he probably doesn’t have any money. He is using public transit carrying fireworks wrapped in newspaper. It is a lot more like the railway company has money. 3. Is the Palsgraph case finally resolved on traditional tort law principles? This is one of the most traditional cases. It finds no fault based on no foreseeability. The dissent shows us the temptation of consideration only the unfortunate plaintiff who is victimized by the incident. Staying true to tort law, if there is no foreseeable harm, there is no duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff. 4. What is meant by the statement: “ the question of liability is always anterior to the question of the measure of the consequences that go with liability”? This means that you have to ask and answer the questions or determine the
More Less

Related notes for Philosophy 2080

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.