Class Notes (839,195)
Canada (511,223)
Philosophy (1,300)
Lecture

Class 5 Answers.docx

3 Pages
141 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
Philosophy 2080
Professor
James Hildebrand

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Description
Class 5 Answers Answers to Class 5 Questions: 1. Why is expert evidence given in a hypothetical manner, and not directly and particularly about the plaintiff? If the expert were to give its opinion specifically about the plaintiff, then this opinion would likely determine the outcome of the trial, and the expert is not the “trier of fact”. The expert gives opinion evidence, and the judge or jury decides, based on all the evidence, what the facts are. Think about it this way: If the expert gave evidence about the standard of care of a surgical procedure, then the jury must determine if that standard would be appropriate in the case before it; whether they accepted the evidence to establish that is what the standard actually is; whether there are special circumstances to raise or lower that standard, etc.. If the expert evidence was too particular, the temptation of the trier of fact is to accept an expert’s account of things and just allow that to determine the outcome of the case. Experts are there to educate when there is a high degree of specialized evidence and information, they are not there to decide the case. 2. Why is it unusual to be thinking about the state of mind of the plaintiff? We are usually thinking about the state of mind of the defendant. And even though in negligence law we apply an objective standard – i.e. the defendant’s intention to harm is not particularly relevant – we are still making that determination about the defendant’s conduct. In Reibl v Hughes we have to decide what the plaintiff is thinking or should be thinking because it relates to the issue of causation. Did the failure to provide information cause the plaintiff to decide to have an operation? 3. In Reibl v Hughes, why does the court reject the use of a subjective account of the plaintiff’s state of mind? The court says that if you used a subjective account of the plaintiff’s state of mind, then every plaintiff, after an unsuccessful operation, would always say he would not have had the operation, and the court would be obliged to grant judgment for the plaintiff in every case. 4. In the same case, in my comments, I stated that I disagreed with the Court of Appeal’s dismissal of battery as a cause of action. Can you figure out why? Battery is an intentional tort, and is therefore actionable per se. The plaintiff would not have to prove actual harm to succeed in his case. In a battery action, the question really is whether the defendant applied force on the person of another without their consent. One could easily imagine that it may be hard to prove a person is better off without an operation, but it still seems wrong, to me, that the defendant would suffer no liability even though he did not give the plaintiff the proper opportunity to consent. The removal of “harm” as a necessary element of the tort, in my opinion, allows the plaintiff to litigate the wrongful action of the defendant. Additionally, it is certainly no stretch of the definition of battery to allow such an action: i.e. the intentional application of force on the person of another without their consent. 5. In the Crocker v Sundance case, why did the court determine that the waivers signed by the plaintiff didn’t protect the defendant? The waiver on the seasons pass lift ticket did not cover the kind of activity the pass was for. The seasons pass was for skiing, not tubing and there were no specific words to exclude all liability, or negligence specifically. As far as the waiver signed to enter into the contest was concerned, this was not binding because the waiver was not drawn to the attention of the plaintiff, nor was it explained. 6. In the same case, do you
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit