Philosophy 2070E Lecture Notes - Lecture 11: Brothel, Public Nuisance, Condom

18 views3 pages

Document Summary

Many thought supreme court of canada is legalizing prosituion. All above are illegal, but prosituion itself is illegal. Law challenged based on s7: right to life, liberty lost by means trying to promote it as business/legal. Stable family life, university graduate, and became a prositute. Worked on streets ater clients refused to wear condom. Trial judge: people deprived of liberty, security (when exposed to harm) Forces prositutes to work for pimps, cant screen clients. Problem with 213 is supreme court already made judgement . For social: legislaive facts, appellant don"t overturn facts. No link to objecive and negaive impact: overly broad, grossly disproporionate, negaive efect cant be jusiied, references not always binding. But, law imposed regulaions that make it dangerous. Court inds causal connecion between harm and law. Many don"t choose as profession, even when they do choose not illegal. Asking to not have laws that will make it more dangerous.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents