Philosophy 2083F/G Lecture Notes - Jus Ad Bellum

34 views2 pages

Document Summary

Question:on page 27 of steinhoffs text the ethics of war and terrorism, he argues that despite an individual"s questionable inclinations, a moral offense is not committed until an individual acts upon said intentions. My question is, for steinhoff is there ever a situation or possibility that an intention can be questionable? does this metaphorical line between intention and action exist still in cases of war whereunder soldiers are. Argumentative structure: aj coates - steinhoffs objections - janna thompson on legitimate authority - Steinhoffs objections = steinhoffs alternative: good paper steinhoff says this about legitimate authority - then give your objections/this leaves a problem - then give your solution. Liberalism from john locke: focus on individual rights, belief in the power of reliability of reason: where liberty and reason are our guides, we can be trusted not to devolve into savagery. Steinhoffs implicit values - medieval philosophy vs enlightenment.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents