Class Notes (835,872)
Canada (509,458)
Lecture

CH 7 Social Constructivism.docx

3 Pages
58 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
Political Science 2231E
Professor
Jessica Trisko
Semester
Fall

Description
Social Constructivism Chapter 7 INTRODUCTION  One of the newest “major theories” in IR  Tries to occupy the middle ground in IR  Proponents of this theory accept the influence of both structures and agency and focus on how they influence each other  Attempts to find a practical answer to the post modern challenge to scientific knowledge in order to be able to conduct empirical research  Interested in the impacts of norms, culture and institutions on international politics  Themes: the construction of national interests, spread of human rights, impact of IOs on state identities and the development of difference forms of international society  Constructivism – means these authors do not accept any social features of life as a given o while they acknowledge human beings are always situated in particular contexts which inform their action they also reproduce or construct their world through their actions. o The world we live in is always contextual o Contrasts neo-realism  which argues the basic features of society are universal and have always been that way o Is a social process – it cannot be done alone, must include the engagement of others o It does not imply voluntarism o Individuals are always part of broader settings in which they can shape – but only within specific context  Social – clarifies a contrast to the focus on language in postmodernism o The construction we are talking about in this context is one that can be observed in the many different practices of actors engaged in international politics  Social constructivists o Analyze how structure and agency affect each other in IR o Express interest in the role of ideas, norms, and institutions in foreign policy making o Believe in an importance of identity and culture in IR o Attempt to understand how interests in policy making are constructed o Accepts that social science cannot operate like the natural sciences ORIGINS rd th  1980s – IR was dominated by the 3 and 4 debates  1 debate: realism and idealism o Questioned about the nature of international politics and the nature of human beings o And whether human beings inherently bad and peace is therefore difficult to achieve o Idealism was revamped to liberalism o Both theories had accepted the state as a central power, and an actor in IR o Disagreed on what is power? Military or economic  2 debate: behaviourialists and traditionalists o About methodology o Behaviourialists wanted to turn IR into a proper science o Traditionalists argued that that international politics cannot be studied like the natural sciences  The traditional (philosophical) methods of historians were more beneficial to understand international politics o Hedley Bull – representative of traditionalists in the 1960s to 1970s  Core figures of English School of IR  Yosef Lapid o Famous article about the future of IR in 1989 Social Constructivism Chapter 7 o Focused on neo-neo camp or “rationalism” and the various approaches that criticized this theory o Attack on rationalism was multi-faceted o Questioned the status of states (ontologically) o Sided with the English School and the traditionalists and rejected the notion of science (in which both neo theories are based on) (methodologically)  Ole Waever rd o Counts the neo-neo debate (above) as the 3 debate o Sees the debate between rationalists and reflectivists as the 4 one  Little to gain from this debate for future development of IR Concept Box: Structure and Agency in IR  This is why social constructivists see themselves as the  We begin with the structures that influence the behaviour of “middle ground” theory individuals  Emanuel Adler – “occupying the space between the individualist account of rationalism (which starts from the  Most theories focus on one side or individual subject) and the holism of structuralism the other and not a combination of (encompassing all accounts of world politics both  Example: explanation of o SC was to provide the via media by accepting some underdevelopment aspects of both theories  Social constructivists define themselves by distancing them o Blame the corrupt leaders from both poles to various degrees (agency) o Blame colonialism or ASSUMPTIONS capitalism (structure)  Max Weber – social co
More Less

Related notes for Political Science 2231E

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit