Class Notes (807,532)
Canada (492,707)
Lecture 4

Lecture Four Political Science 2231E- Oct 2.docx

4 Pages
Unlock Document

Western University
Political Science
Political Science 2231E
Rado Dimitrov

October 2, 2013 The World Bank - After the War Europe was not in a good shape and the US decided to help countries in Europe with loaning them money. - US donated a lot of money in the beginning to kick-start the World Bank, a UN agency. - International Development Agency: focuses on the poorest countries - Third section that helps out private corporations - Fourth section allows private investors to help out countries etc.. - Gives out loans, repayment period is typically longer - Cannot rob the World Bank, no money in the bank per say, all done between private entities and countries through computers. - The World Bank was never just about loans but also helps sustain development in countries and support initiatives against climate change etc.. - Evolved over time to become more than loaning money to European countries. - Offices in hundred countries around the world, with a diverse staff. New boss of the World Bank is from China. Most of the executives are from the developing world, not all controlled by the developed countries like some IGOs. - Every country puts money in and any country can withdraw an amount of money to help them at any time, acts as a trust fund for the world. - IMF and The World Bank - The World Bank allows for any country to withdraw money while the IMF only allows countries in crisis with a dire need for money to withdraw money. - IMF restores financial stability - The World Bank exists to support economic development on a day to day basis. - Developed countries support both organizations, and decisions are based on weighted voting. Whoever contributes the most money gets the largest vote and so on. - Structural adjustment programs: conditions that the organizations can make the recipient country do in order to be given the money. The International Criminal Court - Not a part of the UN system, a separate international institution, not ton be confused with the International Court of Justice which focuses on disagreements between countries. - Created to deal with terrible acts by human beings onto other human beings on a large scale. Response to terrible tragedies such as the Rwanda genocide in 1994. - International justice was needed, could not rely on domestic legal system, most of the time they did not respond. - Ad hoc tribunals: this worked but a more stable international court was needed without Security Council vote (security council could be involved in the crime and could veto the tribunal). - 1994 International Law Commission Draft: treaty of the ICC - Negotiations between 1996 and 1998 took place and a better treaty was established in the end. Negotiations were heated debates because of several issues: - Types of crime: proposals included terrorism and WMDs, drug trafficking etc.. - Jurisdiction and state consent: United States did not want a court that could prosecute citizens of a state without state approval, European countries thought the opposite. - Trigger mechanism: who can start the prosecution, who decides who is prosecuted? - Scope of prosecutor’s authority: what is the role of the independent prosecutor and how to stop political motives. ICC Creation - 120 countries voted for the establishment of the court with 21 abstentions and 7 countries who voted against the ICC; China, Iraq, Israel, Libya, Qatar, USA, and Yemen. - 1998 Rome Statute established the ICC. - Surprisingly the ICC had a overwhelming majority vote, and the treaty was ratified in record time in less than four years, at least 80 countries had to ratify the treaty for it to come into force. Rome Statute 1998 - Established the ICC to address four types of crime:  Genocide  War crimes (includes child soldiers)  Crimes against humanity (includes apartheid, sexual slavery etc..)  Aggression (undefined, recently a conference took place to define aggression but nothing has been decided) - Any country can opt out of any definition, so a country that disagrees with one of the crimes covered cannot be bound by that crime and persecuted for it. So countries that have joined actually have more power to escape persecution than countries that have not joined. Innovations: - New types of war crimes officially recognized - Internal conflict included, civil war crimes are now included in international law. - Key Provisions - Universal Jurisdiction: article 27 applies to any human being no matter who they are (presidents and prime ministers
More Less

Related notes for Political Science 2231E

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.