Class Notes (835,638)
Canada (509,305)
Psychology (6,249)

LECTURE 1.docx

7 Pages
Unlock Document

Psychology 2070A/B
Richard Sorrentino

LECTURE 1: Research Methods in Social Psych Learning to be a Scientist Jan 15 2013 Check this out!! • Teenagers and sex - Teens exposed to sex more likely to engage in sex after Alternatives: hormones! - Alternative thinking is a way to critically analyze certain theories or assumption Ego depletion Goals of Science a. Predict (hypothesize outcome using various known facts and elements) b. Understand c. Control (prisoners and human rights are examples) d. Describe The Scientific Method: - Provides a number of logical steps that allow us to make statements about causal relations between two or more variables - Hume’s Rules for Causality • A means of distinguishing between explanatory (causal) versus descriptive (correlational) research. Punishment causes aggression - Does punishment cause aggression A B Punishment at Home(per day) Teacher’s Ratings of Aggressiveness • 1 to 5 times • 3 • 6-10 times • 6 • 11-15 times • 9 • 16-20 times • 12 • 21 or more times • 15 - Perfect correlation (therefore) accurate assumption? No: • A could cause B or • B could cause A • Because child is more aggressive, they will be further punished - Third factor too: financial situation; environment - Could also be genetics too. • C causes A and B Hume’s Rule (cont) 1. Constant Union -- As A varies B varies • (Descriptive or correlation) • Need to show more correlation 2. Temporal Antecedent -- a change in A must always precede a change in B 3. Spatial-Temporal Contiguity-- A and B must be shown to co-occur in space and time The Church Clock Fallacy (Dawkins) - Has all these elements; constant union, temporal antecedence, spatial-temporal contiguity - So what do we do? - Well, we experiment, using the scientific method. • Have one clock ring and see if other does • Have one ring randomly and see if other follows rings Four Steps of the Scientific Method 1. Formulate Hypothesis(es): Changes in one or more variables cause a change in behaviour. - What do we call the cause • Independent variable - What do we call the effect • Dependent Variable  Note: A hypothesis is a statement about indirectly observable behaviour. - E.g., Punishment causes aggression; why indirectly observable? • Abstract concept – we now must make them concrete 2. Deduce consequences from the hypothesis. Make a statement about directly observable behaviour. - Heart of experimentation - Operational definition of independent and dependent variable - research hypothesis: observable version of Step 1 Let’s use our classroom situation discussed earlier, and our hypothesis that punishment causes aggression. a. What would be an operational definition of our independent and dependent variables, and b. Our research hypothesis version of our hypothesis that punishment causes aggression? - We could have: • Punishment – no recess • Aggression – Yuan’s aggression scale (YAS) 3. Observation time - X = treatment, - O = Observation, - O1 = Observation 1, - O2 = Observation 2 - In this case: • X = no recess • O = YAS Design 1: One case design - X, O1 - OK?? • Immediate observation • Not good as need to know behavior after and before Design 2: Pretest-Post-test Design - O1, X, O2 - OK?? • Compare pre and post treatment  Not as good as sleeping time and wakefulness need to be measured – 3 variable rd also possible Design 3: No Treatment Control Added - MRS. BROWN’S CLASS 01 X 02 - MR. BROWN’S CLASS 01 02 - OK? • Can test another class  Not as good as environments may differ -> selection factors Design 4 - R = Random assignment added to Pre-test Post-Test design - R , O1, X, O2 - R, O1, , O2 - OK? • Random assignment of student into recess and no recess group • GOOD TEST Design 5 - Post-test Only Design (with random assignment) - R, X, O1 - R, , O1 - Do not necessarily need pre-test as less chance of influencing subjects 4. Make statement about hypothesis based on the observations - Internal validity: systematic source of error or can we conclude that we have causation? • random assignment - External validity : even if we have shown causation, does the phenomenon generalize to the real world? • What kinds of things do we need to establish external validity?  must do experiment again; replication – different age, populations, etc. Other considerations - Ethics – cannot slap a kid, scare a kid, harm them, etc. – Ethics Review Board - The social psychology of the psychological experiment: demand characte
More Less

Related notes for Psychology 2070A/B

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.