Class Notes (808,146)
Canada (493,092)
Psychology (6,021)

Language 2.6.docx

2 Pages
Unlock Document

Western University
Psychology 2134A/B
Marc Joanisse

LECTURE 2.6 – Language Processing Continued  Autonomous Theory predicts that top down effects will occur later. Contextual effects occur post processing after our initial parse.  Connectionists propose that multiple syntactic structures are activated t once. The one with the strongest activation wins out as our response. Constraint on activation is caused by sense biases and contextual information.  Eye tracking is a more effective procedure than self paced reading. Self paced reading is very slow and unnatural; it does not effectively examine people’s ability to parse a sentence.  If we recall from last lecture, minimal attachment is a form of online processing. As such, simplicity is a key feature of minimal attachment and it prefers direct objects to sentences compliments.  For example “Mary suspected the man...” o DO = “...from Calgary.” o SO=”...was from Calgary.”  Frazier & Rainer showed these same sentences to people and tracked their eye movements. They discovered that people looked longer at the “was” in the second sentence.  They interpreted this finding as the processing system taking longer because it expects minimal attachment which prefers direct objects over sentence compliments.  Garnsey further studied the relationship between direct objects and sentence compliments. He found that some verbs have a sense bias towards direct objects and others towards sentence compliments. o DO VERB = “Realize” o SC VERB = “Find”  With this knowledge in hand researchers presented people with ambiguous sentences. When people reached the disambiguating part of the sentence it took them longer to process it if the verb conflicted with its sense bias.  These results show that sense bias influences processing. This fining of top-down processing is inconsistent with the Autonomous Theory but it is consistent with the Connectionist perspective of multiple activations.  Minimal Attachment begins to fail however in the Salt Shaker Test. I cannot predict people’s eye movements.  Instead we find that people are combing semantic and syntactic information very quickly. This Salt Shaker Test demonstrated that
More Less

Related notes for Psychology 2134A/B

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.