Class Notes (838,699)
Canada (511,051)
Psychology (6,272)
Adam Cohen (32)
Lecture 6

Lecture 6.docx

3 Pages
Unlock Document

Psychology 2410A/B
Adam Cohen

Lecture 6: Monday, February-25-13 Outline Last Time - Object concept: Piaget…criticisms, competence/performance distinction, VOE method (experiments revealing early competence), explaining A-not-B error (memory, inhibitory control, pedagogy) - Intuitive physics: solidity principle, continuity principle, contact principle - Event categories: support events—variables, contact/no contact, type of contact, amount of contact Object Knowledge  Intuitive Physics o Individuation (OTS)  physical principles (PRS) o Identification (ORS)  Event categories (PRS) - You constantly see objects interacting with each other. For example, you see a water bottle sitting on a table and expect it to be supported and not pass through the table. The kinds of variables related to this concept are picked up over the first few years. Support Events - Category specific variables VARIABLE Contact/no contact Type of Contact Amount of Contact AGE > 3 months > 5 months > 6 ½ months RESULT Babies under three Babies under 5 Babies that are 6 ½ months old don’t months don’t months or older are have this, they do as understand that type more surprised by they get older of contact matters inadequate contact (looking time for no (looking time for (longer looking times contact is greater short platform is vs. for adequate than for contact) longer) object times) - Babies slightly older than 3 months were not surprised when the object was pushed of the table. They concluded that the baby must be thinking that the finger (which pushed the box off the table) was actually attached to the object. When they pushed the object off the table and then removed the finger, they were surprised. - See page 25 in textbook - Piaget underestimated the knowledge babies have about numbers. - Things: rocks, tables, chairs. - Things that are about other things: photos, map, story, number (symbolic), language/words, mental states - Show a screen with a set of dots on each side of the screen, and you had to guess which side had more. You don’t have time to count the dots. How are you able to accurately to know which side has more? You might be using the surface area (how much empty space on each side), but when you control for this variable you get the same results. Density is not the reason either. There is the idea that there is a number system in your head. You are able to approximate the number of dots on the screen. Approximate Number System (ANS) - Properties: o imprecise/noisy (e.g., 10 vs. 20 dots is easy. 10 dots vs. 11 dots is a lot more difficult. 100 vs. 110 dots? Same difference as 10 vs. 20 but
More Less

Related notes for Psychology 2410A/B

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.