Class Notes (836,136)
Canada (509,645)
Sociology (3,243)
Lecture

Social Physchology - Jan10Social Psychology Week 9.docx

5 Pages
53 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
Sociology 2234E
Professor
Charles Levine
Semester
Winter

Description
Lecture 9 - reconstructive knowledge – this theory claims to define an adequate end point to moral development o claims stage 6 is “as moral as you can get” o most adequately morally and psychologically o complementary ideas but adequately complete - stage 6 – requires willfulness on our part - if most adequate then we can understand developmental progress toward it (it already has an end point) - when we talk about morality we are talking about confirming dilemma- it doesn’t exist outside the dilemma - the moral only exists when we have to think about what the right/appropriate should be - problem: it has to balance justice and care [concerns] Justice - a measure of fairness  what is fairness - add responsibility to be fair - golden rule – treat people how you want to be treated  inadequate because it creates its own dilemma/unknown - may have developmentally different definitions - before fairness talk about – distributive  reciprocity (implies some exchanges should be proper, values equalized), retributive  relate to fairness, struggling to be just is also struggling to be fair Care - concerns for the needs of others/being sensitive to needs - helping people - feeling responsible for needs of others - possible to be caring an unjust - care and justice can slide into one another – they mix - stages are attempt to make sense of a complementary relationship between justice and care Sheet - pre-norms and morality (obeying norms/fulfilling desires) - conventional – reasoning of various ways to understand relationships with others and social world - post – how we understand relationships when we have to norm norms - PRINCIPLE – maximum that allows/gives one direction about norming norms (creating them/naming what the relationships should be between norms) o enables you to appropriately norm norms Stage 1 - motive = avoid punishment and obey rules - take a norm and articulate a simple norm based on that activity; thinks that the moral has been achieved with this type of logic - close to Piaget – heteronomy - presumption that they know the norm and proceeds - obligation based on motivation  sometimes doesn’t even noticed there is a dilemma Stage 2 - an exchange process can’t work - getting what you want through exchanges - moral = if it gets you what you want - satisfaction of one’s own desires and occasionally the needs of others - norm, reciprocity, exchange - if you can get it, then get it - ability to articulate what seems to be care - moves to stage 3 – invest in moral – instead of moral being get what you want, it is defined by the morals of a good relationship Stage 3 - involved with others = obligations, norms of relationship inform the moral - world divided into good people and bad people - intentionality – good intentionality/people – Golden Rule - assumes they agree with your definition of good Stage 4 - thinks about people who fulfill their duties (social positions) and obligations - these social obligations take precedence over private relationships Stage 5 - postconventional  ones relationship to norms changes – in context to dilemma – a stage 5 reason notices that norms have to be norms - person senses themselves stepping outside to order something in the social - outside position looking in - decides which norms/obligations should be changed - an autonomy that’s recognized - can understand that fairness/justice involves uncoerced contracts with others – not defined by law, but defined by consent of consenting parties – the law reinforces these obligations - rank order what it considers to be relevant values/norms in a dilemma and make a choice based off this rank - fair contracts, decisions based on rank of ordering values - monological reasoning opposed to dialogical reasoning/solution - moral adds fair contracts - assumes that persons are [moral] o it’s a given - developmental change is not relevant to moral reasoning - persons are formative – have to move to 6 Social Perspective Level - changes in conception of social world and person - moral reasoning somehow tied to conceptions - S1 – your own - S2 – can include other people to interact/exchange with - S3 – relationship to relationships - S4 – relationships to abstract notion of system and to others persons - S5 – contracts View of Persons - S1 – irrelevant to moral reasoning - S2 – concerned with norms and getting what they want - S3 – concerned with norms and getting what they want and good in the eyes of others - S4 - concerned with norms and getting what they want and good in the eyes of others and social person/ citizen - S5 - ? These understandings are cumulative and integrated; s
More Less

Related notes for Sociology 2234E

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit