Class Notes (837,447)
Canada (510,273)
Sociology (3,254)
Lecture

Social Control Theories.docx

5 Pages
42 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
Sociology 2259
Professor
Pamela Cushing
Semester
Winter

Description
Deviance Jan 11 Social Control Theories of Deviance The question: why do people commit crime? Is transformed with social control theories to ... “ why don't more people do it? Has to do with social controls and effectiveness. Control theories assume that everyone is capable of deviance It also says that we are all born deviants. When social control works, it creates CONFORMITY; when it fails, it does not necessarily create deviance, it just provides the individual with opportunities to choose a deviant path Focus is on socialization and super saturation of the individual Social control theories are in the realm of positivism – objective approach. More scientific. There is an explanation that science can provide. Travis Hirschi: Social Bond Theory Why aren't you a criminal? Answer: A stake in conformity Similar to classical theory and Hobbs and the social contract. Same foundational idea that society needs structure to function. Deviance occurs when social bonds become weak or broken If you care about what people think you are less likely to deviate. Argues we are firmly bonded to conventional society and therefore do not deviate. Fundamental bias in this theory towards the “ideal” family. The family is the primary socialization factor in this theory. What is a good family? Nuclear family Middle class values white conforming Strict gender roles and traditional gender roles Bad family: abuse single parent non-white disability criminal blended homosexual parents Focus on this theory is stay at home moms. Not dad. If the child grows up bad then the mother is to blame. Stats say that children are at greater risk of child abuse at home then anywhere else. When moms stay at home they feel isolated, stressed and devalued. Some theories suggest this puts children at greater risk of child abuse. Hirschi argues that we are born deviant and we have to be steered in the right direction by our family. Hirschi: 4 Main Types of Bonds 1) Attachment: to significant others. Family and reference others. Reference others are those we hold as standards people we want to be like. School is the second most influential control – helps you develop bonds. We are not talking about this in the extreme (psycho paths with no attachment) Regular teenagers have some resentment toward parents. Those who poor attachment would be attracted to gang involvement. He argues if you have strong attachment to the family you are less likely to deter from the conforming path. “We are moral beings to the extent we are social beings” Hirschi also focused on academic success important to attachment. It has been updated to say it is about bonding with a peer group at school. That is more important than grades. 2) Commitment: to occupational aspirations. Career employment vs survival jobs. The higher your aspirations are the higher you have a commitment to conformity. Does not explain white collar crime and it is classist! 3) Involvement: keeping your kids busy. Youth that do their homework and are members of sports teams are more likely to conform. Those who are not involved are more likely to do drugs etc. 4) Belief: youth invested in the norms and values of the family and school and society. They will more likely conform. If you think police are oppressive, teachers a dumb, you are more likely to be deviant. This does not take into account families that live different lifestyles that are not criminal. There is no explanation for people who have strong bonds in all four but go on to be deviant. You have to integrate other theories to fill in the gaps of this one. Walter Reckless: Containment Theory Early version of social control perspective. Focus: On INNER and OUTER factors that “Contain” the average person but are weak or absent in deviants They can be both direct and indirect Inner controls: are self controls. Your ability to control yourself. These inner controls can be both direct and indirect. Direct would be the ability to feel shame guilt it is our conscience. It is our inner strength our ability to take responsibility. If any of this is weak or absent we are more likely to be deviant. Indirect Inner control would be based on an individual rational interest on maintaining conformity. It is how we want to be see
More Less

Related notes for Sociology 2259

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit