Class Notes (811,335)
Canada (494,663)
Sociology (3,133)

Sociology 2151A.docx

18 Pages
Unlock Document

Western University
Sociology 2151A/B
William Marshall

Sociology 2151A The growth of people living in cities it the last ~10,000 years Urbanization: More and more people living in places defined as urban Urbanism: The way of life associated with cities. NOT THE SAME THING! C. Fischer – “You can’t have one without the other” - Not the general belief You can have an urban lifestyle without urbanization. You can have one without the other. Urban Ecology – the interaction between the city and the people who live there. - We have to look at 4 things (P.O.E.T.) o Population – the number of people and how dense they are o Organization – We have changing social organization  S.E.S. – Socio-Economic Stratification (The richer get what they want, and the poor can’t)  Social Classes – the rules of behavior get more complicated. o Environment – In order for a population to grow, you need WATER.  The amount of water and food determine how long a civilization can survive. o Technology – technology involves the distribution of water.  How do you get resources to the city and distribute them Subsistence Agriculture – Grow enough food to feed ourselves, if environment gets bad, they die. Crop Surplus – we have more than what we need (barter it, sell it, do something with the extra) Granary – place to store crop surplus Occupational Specialization – As you settle down, you have more and more stuff. Somebody needs to build a granary, someone has to protect it, someone has to maintain it, someone has to fund it, someone has to know when to plant and harvest crops (in between last and first frost). These are all occupational specializations. There are changes in the size of the family. As technology improves, the size of the family increases. Multi-generational network (a.k.a. Extended Kinship network) Primogeniture – the first born gets everything from the parents, handed down. - This is a form of stratification o The eldest son gets a farm, and has to take care of his brothers and sisters, and gives them a small piece of land. The eldest son is a higher class than the other brothers and sisters, because he has land, and equipment ~8 – 10kya, people stopped wandering and began settling. Crossroad within a wall (Egyptian hieroglyphic for city) Domestication of plants and animals Crop Surplus Buildings Villages Cities Increasing Water population Characteristics that differentiate the first cities from their predecessors (V. Gordon Childe): 1. Permanency 2. Non-agricultural specialists (black/white/gold/silversmiths etc) 3. Taxation and capital accumulation (No public buildings w/o public fundin) 4. Public buildings 5. A ruling class 6. Writing and numbers 7. Predictive ‘sciences’ – Agronomy was one of the first sciences (science of agriculture), uses astronomy (seeing when stars line up to tell date) 8. Art – Embellish buildings to make them look better. 9. Trade 10. Residential basis for citizenship – People were granted privileges to enter the city walls. Greek City-states – 3,000 years ago. Phratries – Brotherhood (fraternities). Groups which had certain rights, which not everybody has. The slaves/peasants had no rights Acropolis – “High City” – city on a hill. Phratries lived in these cities – well protected Agora – meeting place, a place for the exchange of goods. Roman Empire – City populations became astronomical because of this. Circus Maximus – Largest stadium ever, even larger than any stadium today. There were so many people in Rome that had nothing to do, so they needed to be entertained. There were games and events here on a regular basis. Endentured Servitude – People sold themselves and their family in order to survive In Europe, the Catholic was very powerful. They controlled science, knowledge, everything. The Bubonic Plague wiped out about half of the population of major European cities. It also wiped out the power of the catholic church. Day 3 City Date Population Areas (Acres) Paris 1192 59,200 945 Rome 1198 35,000 3450 Venice 1363 77,700 810 London 1377 34,971 720 Amsterdam 1470 7,500 195 At the beginning of the Rennaisance (Rebirth), Italy began to unite between its city states. Trade began to increase, trade of money and ideas. A standardized coinage system arises. They began to build town squares, artists were hired such as Michael angelo to design the city. There was a rebirth of society and civilization in turn, The cities began to turn some of their power to the state. At the end of the dark ages, there was no concept of taxes and so they began to come back. Taxation meant there would be money for public buildings, etc. Peoples main means of transportation was to walk which limited the ability of the city to expand. People had a lot of kids at this point because there was a high infant mortality rate. Life expectancy was very short. This began to change and the mortality rate started to drop around 1750 because nutrition was more valued. The animals were fed better, people were eating more fruits and vegetables, etc. Sanitation began to be more valued, people began to bathe. Stage 1 – Malthusian population, Stage 2 – Demographic gap or transition population (1700 – 1900), Stage 3 – Modern population (1900 - ). People were still having a lot of kids (unaware of the lowered infant mortality rate) There are agricultural advancements; the realization that it is important to grow…. 1800-1890 – there is a huge population boom, population increasing 4 -5 times, even 9- 10 times. (London 850,000 in 1800 to about 4,000,000 in 1890) There is a market economy (Stage 3) Pre-industrial Urban-industrial DEMOGRAPHIC - High mortality - Low mortality - High fertility - Low fertility BEHAVIOURAL - Particularistic - Universalistic - Prescribed - Functionalistic - Multi-roles per - Specific role(s) individual - Emphasis on innovation - Traditional mores and achievement POLITICAL - Religious authority - Secular polity - Interpersonal - Elected authority communication - Mass media - Education of the elite - Rational bureaucracy - Societal control - Secondary control - Mass education SPATIAL - Parochial (narrow - Regional/national scope) interdependence - Close ties to - Specialized roles surroundings - Geographic mobility - Life = neighbourhood - Central Business District - Decentralization (CBD) SOCIETAL - Extended family - Atomized - Ethnic cohesion - Ethnic cleavages - No middle class - Destruction of family - Small elite - Functions to agencies - Disadvantaged - Middle class majority masses ECONOMIC - Non-monetary - Pecuniary based exchange - Interdependence - Little specialization - Capital intensive - Hereditary roles - Division of labour - Home = workplace - Socio-economic - Non-standardized mobility workplace - Standardization Eventually all of the problems od the fast growing city filled with bad smell and disease, etc, led to the inception of the suburb. People were able to transport to the outer city because of transportation routes of train and street cars. The city then doubles in radius. The rich people move out of the crowded, messy city. The poor people are still in the city, they cant afford the transportation costs or the homes etc. The people who move out tend to be in the family foundation years, 30-40. The older people are left in the city, this means the average age of people in the suburbs is lower than that of the city. Academics around 1850 began to notice these changes (city, outer city) Ferdinand Toennies (Germany): there are changes in society due to the urban industrialization of our society. He wrote a book called Gemeinshaft und Gesselshaft (way of life in the small town, village rural community) and (fast based compact, city life) Chapter 1,2,5,6 Day 4 Ferdinand Toennies – credited with being the father of urban sociology. Described contrasting lifestyles (ones that used to exist, and ones that do) – Gemeinschaft. Everybody knows everybody, who their enemies are, who their friends are, etc. Gemeinschaft roughly equals Community. People working together, care about one another, common language, common good, common evil, common interests. Everything is the same. It is the best place to live for the people living there. It is the normal, natural way of living. The way things are supposed to be. The problem, according to Toennies, was that the Gemeinschaft was coming to an end. Gemmeinschaft becomes Gesellschaft. Gesellschaft roughly equals association. People don’t know each other, and it doesn’t really matter. Sociologists call this apathy. There is a general disconcern for everybody else. People are egocentric. People want to do things in their own way, as an individual. Selfish, Egotistical, uncaring, apathetic. All these characteristics are the lifestyle in Gesellschaft. One person is different from those around. Lack of trust, caring, etc. Toennies says that a Gesellschaft is inevitable, and there is nothing we can do about it. According to Toennies, Gesellschaft is unnatural. If you’re spending time with other people, you should get to know them. Human beings shouldn’t live this way. This was around 1887 (around the turn of the last century) Emile Durkheim (1893) wrote the Division of Labour. This is the key to understanding society. There are a few occupations in a traditional society, everybody can do anything, people share everything. There is a mechanical solidarity. People are bound to the people around them by common similarities. The common backgrounds tell the society when to do what. History dictates what happens that day. Clothing is predetermined by society. It is a mechanical process. You have no choice in the matter, you do these things. If you don’t do whatever everybody else does, you are not a part of the community. This is not how we’re going to live in modern society. In Modern society, there is an organic solidarity. There is lots of specialization and competition. Everybody has a specialized task to do. This is normal, this is natural, this is the way a body works, and also how contemporary societies work. There is a division of labour and people specialize. This is preferable to the nature of mechanically organized towns. There is free will in an organic society. According to Durkheim, the only way to develop your full human potential, you must exercise free will. This allows for human development. We are moving away from mechanically solidified society, to an organically solidified society, as this allows us to develop fully. Durkheim and Toennies are similar in their views of how societies evolve from one organization to a new organization. They saw the evolutionary nature from the old way to the new way of living. Georg Simmel (1905) – thinking about life within the cities. Wasn’t interested in the evolutionary nature of cities, rather, with how people behave within cities. We make rational choices as to whats important and what not important – social reserve. He wrote “Metropolis and Mental Life”. Social Reserve nowadays may be called Selective perception. We make choices and see how this affects us. People behave in a way that makes their lives easier, and helps them maintain sanity. You know whats important to you, and you do those things. You filter out those things that are not important to you. This gives you the appearance of being apathetic. This rationality allows us to maximize our individual development and our individual freedom, but it seems to make us cut off and alienated from others. Max Weber (Véber) – wrote a book called The City (1921 – published) His big contribution was that we should look at cities scientifically. You have to look for hard facts and information, in order to analyze patterns in the evolution of cities. Came up with the term Full Urban Community – his conceptualization of the ultimate city. #1 things is that the city needs to be based on trade and commerce. There also must be some degree of autonomy – some degree of control over your laws and behavior. Basically, your own legal system, judiciary force, police force, military autonomy, etc. Be self-sufficient to some degree. His ideas are a little extreme, as they basically dictate medieval cities, city within walls, with moat, and guards, etc…. He said that cities of the 20 century will be doomed. They are worse than the cities before, and the cities before that, and the city before that, etc. The best is in the past. Cities are not progressing positively, rather negatively. Full urban community is an ideal type, but not the only ideal type. All four people offer their opinions on how cities develop, and that cities are offering things they never have before, good or bad. Chicago (1850) – pop, 30,000 (1870) – 300,000 (1890) – 1.1M (1910) – 2.2M (1930) – 3.4M Immigrants from all over the world were moving into Chicago. People didn’t move here because the city had similarities to their hometowns, rather it had heterogeneity. Chicago offered a diverse culture and a broad gathering of people. The first department of Sociology was set up in Chicago in 1890(?) Robert Park (1916) – wrote a paper called Suggestions for investigation of human behavior in urban environment. Basically, the only way to learn about cities is to go out there and experience it and watch it. There is a pattern in the city. He used to be a journalist for about 15 years, so this allowed him to gather his knowledge about cities, as he would watch it and report about it. He said his conclusions were based on observational field research. First conclusion was that a city is a commercial structure (Weber). Chicago could not exist without the cattle industry. This allowed it to grow and expand. There has to be a complex division of labour (Durkheim) – specialization, erosion of traditional lifestyles. He unified the ideas of past theorists. Secondly, The traditional role of the family is replaced by complex structures (Weber). Judicial structures were implemented over traditional structure. Town meetings were implemented – bureaucracy, etc. Thirdly, city dwellers are more rational. They don’t do things out of sentiment and emotion, rather, they do whats in their best interest (Simmel). Louis Wirth – wrote Urbanism as a Way of Life (1938). THE most influential piece of literature written in urban sociology. Was a student at the University of Chicago. He said a city is a large, dense permanent settlement, with social/cultural heterogeneity. A lot of people living in close proximity with each other. 3 factors: Size, Density, and Heterogeneity. Urbanization: more and more people living in urban areas Urbanism: unique urban lifestyle. Day 5 Evolutionary nature of society. Urbanization – Chicago was urbanizing. Lots of people living in small areas. Robert park, a journalist, studied with Simmel and more, starting thinking about this urbanization as he saw it happen. Said the only way to analyze a city is to do field research. Go out and see the city for yourself. Louis Wirth – one of the more important students of park. He was interested in urbanism – the way of life associated with cities. Urbanization vs Urbanism (These terms mean different things). He said that Size, density, and homogeneity cause people to behave in a particular matter. Size - increase in the number of inhabitants of a settlement beyond a certain limit brings about changes in the relations of people and changes in the character of the community - The greater the number of people interacting, the greater the potential differentiation - Dependence upon a greater number of people, lesser dependence on particular persons - Association with more people, knowledge of a smaller proportion, and of these, less intimate knowledge - More secondary rather than primary contacts; that is, increase in contacts which are face to face, yet impersonal, superficial, transitory, and segmental - More freedom from the personal and emotional control of intimate groups. - Association in a large number of groups, no individual allegiance to a single group. Density – Reinforces the effect of size in diversifying individuals and their activities, and in increasing the structural complexity of the society. - Tendency to differentiate and specialization - Separation of residence from work place - Functional specialization of areas – segregation of functions - Segregation of people: city become
More Less

Related notes for Sociology 2151A/B

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.