Writing 2121F/G Lecture Notes - Interdisciplinarity, Irene Gammel, New Criticism

63 views3 pages

goldbat756

22 Nov 2011

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Report the main idea of the work. Will open by naming the title and author of the work. Will be in your own words (no quotations) Will deal with a specific section of a larger work. Will be in your own words: you must change both the diction and the syntax of the original. Will open with a signal phrase that identifies the author or source. Recent studies place the baroness"s work at the centre of american modernism. Gammel suggests that the baroness created the sculpture god , a sculpture previously attributed to morton schaumberg. Moreover, gammel speculates that the work, fashioned from a plumbing fixture, directly influenced duchamp"s seminal work. Will open with signal phrase identifying the author. Will be integrated into the sentence in a grammatically correct manner. When the language is particularly expressive, vivid, or resistant to effective paraphrase:

Related Questions

THIS IS FOR HUMANITIES CLASS In 300-500 words, answer this:

Do you think there should be limits on technological advancement? If not, why not, if so, why? Then, respond to a classmate who takes an opposing position.

3) PEER EVALUATION: It is required that students also post one response that evaluates a post by another student. In this post you should do one of the following: 1) offer constructive criticism of the student's explanation or understanding of the topic under discussion or 2) explain what the student has done correctly in addressing the topic discussion. Criticism or praise should provide specific reasons why the post under evaluation is praiseworthy or lacking in some respect. The purpose of peer evaluation is not class debate but cooperative learning, that is, by evaluating each other's work we will try to develop collective insights that will benefit not just the student whose work is being evaluated but the entire class.

harlequingnat472

Please read the article from (you can copy and paste the link in browser to open the article)

https://www.homeworkmarket.com/sites/default/files/qx/16/07/18/06/article_-_the_poor_as_suppliers_of_intellectual_property___a_social_network_appropach_to_sustainable_poverty_alleviation.pdf

and compose a narrative response of at least 2 pages that

1. Briefly (1 paragraph) summarizes the article
2. Claims the strength or validity of the author's claims,
3. Supports your claims about the author's work with specific evidence from the article
4. Makes a supported recommendation about whether someone in your field should use this article in his/her own research or writing.

Your critique should be in essay format, using complete sentences and paragraphs. It should begin with a summary that identifies the article and author. That should be followed by your evaluation of the research and writing of the article, supported by evidence. Finally, you should conclude with a 1 paragraph recommendation, again supported by evidence, about the use of the article.

fuchsiaox333

1. When a block quotation is used in a research paper,punctuation _______ the parenthetical citation.

A. is set off by a comma from
B. precedes
C. follows
D. is omitted from

2. When you search an online library catalog or a search engine,the first step is to enter _______, words or phrases that describeyour topic.

A. keywords
B. FAQs
C. abstracts
D. domain extensions

3. Suppose that you're going to interview someone in preparationfor writing a research paper on teaching techniques formacroeconomics. For this topic, who would be the best person tointerview?

A. A professor of macroeconomics
B. An economist
C. A student in a macroeconomics course
D. The president of a university

4. Which of the following would not be considered aprimary source?

A. Original research reports

B. A book about your subject written by abiographer

C. Letters, diaries, or speeches

D. Eyewitness accounts

5. In academic writing, why would you prefer to rely oninformation from scholarly journals rather than magazines?

A. Scholarly journals never includevisuals.

B. Scholarly journals are more difficult tofind, and therefore more valuable.

C. Magazines use every-day experiences anddiscuss popular topics.

D. Authors in scholarly journals are generallyspecialists in their field.

Writing 2121F/G Lecture Notes - Interdisciplinarity, Irene Gammel, New Criticism

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

Writing 2111F/G Lecture 11: Lecture 11 Notes

Related Questions