Class Notes (835,494)
Canada (509,211)
Business (3,286)
BU231 (319)
Valerie Irie (103)
Lecture

Lecture 1 - Tort Law.docx

7 Pages
73 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Business
Course
BU231
Professor
Valerie Irie
Semester
Winter

Description
Lecture 1 Managing Risk • Assessing potential legal risks that businesses face • Determining methods to reduce that risk – Prevention • Devising strategies to cope with legal issues when they arise – Resolution options The Legal System in Canada • Common Law vs. Civil law – Quebec follows civil system of law, all of their laws are codified – Most english speaking countries follow common law system – Within Common law system there is civil law, which is law between civilians (Civil) where civilian vs Crown is criminal • Federal vs. Provincial • Constitution Act, 1982 – Charter of Rights and Freedoms • If a statute is enacted that violates Charter, then the supreme court can strike it down • Judges can also not create a law that violates a statue • Higher the court, the more stature a law hasàhowever a low court judge can set precedent, but cannot violate statute or Charter • Statute – Law that is codified (written down) and is created by the various levels of government – Criminal Code/Tax Act/etc is a statute – Statute will always overrule common law • Judge made law – stare decisis • Precedent – People referring to prior cases and their decisions to influence their cases – Eventually forms the body of law, grown over time Legalese • Some terms you need to know: – Action = the lawsuit • Bring a civil action/sueing someone in a court of law – Cause of Action = the type of lawsuit, e.g. tort • The type of action you are suing them for – Plaintiff/Defendant = parties to the action • Plaintiff person with complaint • Defendant person defending action – Claim = the reason for the lawsuit – Damages = amount of money – Prima Facie = “on the face of it” Tort Law • Personal injury – About receiving compensation for harm done to a person or their property – Could also be purely economic harm • Compensation for harm done – Compensatory in nature NOT punitive – Punitive measures do not help the victim deal with the damages/etc done to them • Tort law is between individuals – When bringing a lawsuit, it is the plaintiff or prosecutor who has the obligation to prove their case • Criminal law is between individuals and the state • Different standards of proof required between tort law and criminal law – Tort – balance of probabilities • Have to show 51% chance or better that defendant liable, or not held liable – Criminal – beyond a reasonable doubt • If not found guilty then they are not liable • Have to be beyond sure that person is guilty of their crime Object of Tort Law • The object of tort law is to place the injured party back in the position s/he would’ve been, had the tortious act not occurred • Look at past and other cases to decide on costs • Realistically, all that can be done is compensate with money • Always subjective Definition • A tort is a wrongful act* done to the person or property of another • Have to have a harm for tort to occur, as otherwise nothing to compensate for * Harm is a required element of any tort – the wrongful act must cause harm Strict Liability - History • The requirement of a writ – Category of wrongdoing acknowledged in law • Strict liability – no need to prove fault • If there was a writ, automatically found liable and had to compensate plaintiff Tort Law Evolved • Today, the conduct of the tortfeasor must be taken into consideration • The wrong committed must still be one recognized in law • The wrong committed must cause harm to the injured party • Fault must be shown in some degree in order for injured party to receive compensation • Tortfeaser is the wrongdoer • Requires both element of harm and fault • Our tort system today is fault based* *Some torts do not require an element of fault Conduct Scale • Accidental ------ Negligent ----- Intentional • Can’t sue for accidental or non responsible acts • Broadest category of wrongdoing is negligence, not taking care to prevent harm Strict Liability Torts • Some torts by statute are still considered to be strict liability and therefore, no fault element is required – E.g. public nuisance • Nuisance: – Public Nuisance – interference with the lawful use of public
More Less

Related notes for BU231

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit