Class Notes (839,147)
Canada (511,218)
CS315 (25)
Lecture

315 lecture notes.docx

5 Pages
102 Views

Department
Communication Studies
Course Code
CS315
Professor
Martin Dowding

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Description
CS315 Week 2 – January 13, 2014 - Burke video (on reserve at library) Printing Press - Eisenstein’s Printing Press as an Agent of Change: o Studies were viewed as by and for disparate groups: typographers, librarians and bibliographers, literary scholars, economists, social historians. - Eisentsteins refers favourably to French and British scholars (Steinberg) - 500 years of Printing (Steinberg) o Was most influential, now out of date…but…’populist’ - The history of printing is an integral part of the general history of civilization - Steinberg’s “best” sentence for Eisenstein - Burke says everything changed, socially, culturally, economically, in Western religion – because of the advent of the press. - Burke provides a broad acknowledgement of the “revolution” Eisenstein writes about - But she was unhappy about how limited the acknowledgement was elsewhere - The press IS wonderful… but why? - Eisenstein cites Steinberg: o “Neither political, constitutional, ecclesiastical, and economic events, nor sociological, philosophical, and literary movements can be fully understood without taking into account the influence the printing press…(continue once posted on MLS) - Eisenstein points out that our mental habits changed because of the press (McLuhan). - Eisenstein says, while we have so much new text – we can’t tell how human behavior has changed. - Standardization: laws, language, production… but how does access (overload) affect human behavior? - She left out some enquiries about human behavior… - > Behavior: Before mass printing, the illiterate were read to – out loud, the literate read out loud, to themselves… but later, silently - Before mass printing people often had to guess when they were born, or what they owned – recall the inheritance’s scene in Printing Transforms Knowledge: but they had different ways of remembering. - > Difficulty for Eisenstein: o We can’t assess printing without knowing what writing was before the press i.e. in ‘scribal culture’. - Eisenstein muses that: we can only conjecture about pre-literate life…but she has a Western-oriented bias; - We observe surviving non-literate societies as sociologists, anthropologists, and communication studies scholars (e.g. non-numerate Brazilian tribe; Rom) - Eisenstein and scarcity of MSS: - > Few other MSS to compare with as copying going on - Burke makes the same point when he refers to perpetuation of errors in scriptoria – due to an original error - Why so few MSS? Who read? How MSS created? What methods? - Press: o Little standardization (hugely important) o When did it happen? By what means? o How many copies made in the scriptoria? o Titles problematic? o Indexes? o Tables of contents? (recall burke’s film) - Print as commodity (Commodities? What sells? Why) - Capitalist press owner would need to know how many copies printed, sold, how much paper, ink used – how many hours employees worked - Not the church’s motto “laborare est orare” – “to work is to worship.” But an interesting irony arose… o Abbot of Spondheim, devoted to o Scriptoria: where the monks did their writing, scribes and velum (velum?) is animal skin shaved off animal hair and layer of skin. o Printed a book, on paper o Praise of Scribes – double meaning?  1) Working in the Scriptorium was considered praise – “laborare est orare” – “to work is to worship”  2) Abbot was praising work of scribes - Why did Abbot choose paper over velum? o Wanted to spread word and news fast - Other monks took advantage of print as well…why? Sign of change in human behavior. Speed and breadth of distribution – helped and challenged religion. - But what did the press allow the Church to create and accelerate? And what was the purpose? (Burke’s film) - Important to consider why Marshall McLuhan appears in Eisenstein’s book - In The Gutenberg Galaxy McLuhan creates an “anti-text” - Insists, like new digital media, there may not have to be a “beginning” or an “end” in text – jump in anywhere? - With computers, we jump in anywhere; we don’t start at the beginning. - In lots of McLuhan’s work he asked: o What is text? o What is a book? o What are the “new media”? o What will they do to us? We ask this now because…? o Issues Eisenstein saw as flaws in analysis of the press - Can we abandon all hard-copy knowledge? - Whose responsibility is it to choose what is recorded digitally? - What knowledge will be left behind? - Ethical questions of huge proportion - Speaking of ethics… - > Did secular, non-religious, print lead to very bad literature, unethical activities? - Harlequin Romance - News of the world, pornography, “non” literature? - Is the printing press the greatest commodity ever invented - Early printers = pioneers in manufacturing and marketing - Can we say that ab
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit