Class Notes (837,447)
Canada (510,273)
Criminology (475)
CC100 (135)
Lecture 6

CC100 Lecture 6: Conservative Theories
Premium

3 Pages
56 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Criminology
Course
CC100
Professor
Andrew Welsh
Semester
Winter

Description
Conservative Theories CC100 Deterrence Theories Social context – 1970’s  1960’s started out with optimism (Civil rights movement) o LBJ- He was elected and made the ‘Great Society’ o Cultural Revolution, people started to dress differently, rebellion, etc. o Warren Court o Civil Rights Movement  1970’S Pessimism o Increase in drug and violent street crime o Altamont free concert: Bands would get together and the Hell’s Angels would show up for “free security” and many people would be killed o Kent State Shootings: happening in Kent Ohio, involved the shooting of unarmed college students by the Ohio National Guard. Some of the students that were shot had been protesting the Cambodian Campaign during the Vietnam war o Vietnam and Watergate Deterrence theories  Classical theory revisited o Crime was based on choice; all criminals have free will. The punishment should fit the crime.  Re-emergence in 1970’s  Robert Martinson – nothing works  James Q. Wilson wrote a book called Thinking about Crime  Attacked the positivist view that crime results solely from social forces Mandatory Minimum Sentences  These force judges to deliver fixed sentences to individuals convicted of crime, regardless of culpability or other mitigating factors  California o Mandatory 25 year sentence (3 Strikes) o Any third felony conviction, 2 serious convictions. o E.g.: stealing a pizza slice  Effects o Increased Court Costs. Most cases are pretty minor. (Whether or not the crime should follow with a mandatory sentence is in the criminal code) o $20 Billion additional cost from more people in prison and court costs o ¼ of inmate population o There is also no study that shows it actually deters crime, there is little support  Do three strikes laws work? o Little empirical support for crime reduction effects o Potential increases in homicide rates  Why don’t they work? o They’re not a deterrent: low crime-reporting rate, many crimes aren’t reported by police o Role of alcohol, drugs, mental health. How good is your decision when under the influence? Certainty of Punishment  E.g.: Individualized deterrence o Offenders heavily involved in crime are individually warned that their actions are being monitored and future crime will be dealt with immediately. o E.g.: Operation Ceasefire (Boston)  Iclicker Question: Which of the following events may have contributed to a shift from labeling theories to the more conservative deterrence-based perspectives on crime? o Martinson declares, “nothing works” in his review of correctional programming. Section II: Rational Choice Theory  Two guys D. Cornish and R.C. Clarke believed crime is the result of deliberate choices made by offenders based on their calculation of the risks and rewards of these choices. (Rational choice theory) o People are hedonistic: they look for pleasure. Utilitarian = outweigh pros and cons  The concept of rationality: The decision-making process of determining the opportunities for meeting desired needs, the potential costs of action, and the anticipated benefit o Rationality: o Full rationality is not required o Decision-making process does not have to be sophisticated o Adequate or accurate information is not needed  Offender Decision making o Decision-making occurs in two distinct areas o Involvement decisions o Event decisions: “where should I go to get this money?” “Should I commit break and enter?” ▪ Easily accessibility, few police patrols, larger gardens, detached house, and patio doors  Involvement model o Background factors (E.g.: upbringing) o Previous experience and learning o Solutions evaluated  Structuring crime o The decision to commit crime is structured by the choice of location, target characteristics, and techniques available for completion o Example: crack dealers and avoidance apprehension techniques ▪ Environmental positioning: Popular area where there are not a lot of police and where they can see every direction. They want to be able to see long distances. ▪ ‘Peep game’ ▪ Drug handling techniques (E.g.: stashing) o Example
More Less

Related notes for CC100

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit