Class Notes (834,026)
Canada (508,290)
LY205 (13)
Lecture

chapter3,4 crimreview.odt

4 Pages
127 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Law & Society
Course
LY205
Professor
Patricia O' Reilly
Semester
Fall

Description
Chapter 3 Factual causation versus legal causation- definition and difference 43 factual: how the deceased came to be dead, and the contribution of the accused. Legal: (also known as imputable) whether the accused should be held accountable/responsible in law for the death difference: Factual is physical, the actions of the accused, and legal is psychological. (mens rea-legal, while factual could be actus reus) What does the Crown need to do to establish factual causation? 43 Crown needs to prove “but for” the actions, the consequence would NOT have happened. Foreseeability- what is it and why is it important? 44 ability to see consequences. It's important because some people can't see consequences, because of things (diabilities) they cannot control. Acceleration of death –what is it and why is it important? 'Where a person causes to a human being a bodily injury that results in death, he causes the death of that human being notwithstanding that the effect of the bodily injury is only to accelerate his death from a disease or disorder arising from some other cause.” The majority decision in the Rodriguez case -49 she would not be allowed to committ assissted suicide. Passive versus active euthanasia 50 passive: withholding treatment (like life support or nutrition) active: injection with drugs or a lethal substance to kill the human. The Smithers case and the finding of Supreme Court 51-2 hockey game- smithers pursued cobby after the game, kicked him, cobby died as a result of a faulty flap in his throat when he puked. Was found guilty. Appeal was dismissed. “Significant Contributing cause” to the death of the deceased. Kitching and Adams case- what is the issue and understand it? 54 Deceased suffered brain death, was on life support. Doctors had him on life support until they removed kidneys, then pulled the life support plug. Defendants argued that it broke the chain of causation and that they did not KILL HIM. Rejected and were convicted. The Smith case and how it is enshrined in the Criminal Code of Canada 56 is this smith or smithers? What is the definition of causing death by acting on the victim’s mind? “influence on the mind” cannot be convicted if you caused death solely on psychological (fear, intimidation) means. If deceased had pre-existing condition that caused death when in fear or intimidated, you cannot be convicted. Chapter 4 Definition of mens rea refers to all mental elements other than voluntariness. They cary from crime to crime. Mens rea according to Justice McLachlin in the case of Theroux 67 the wrongful intention of the accused. Subjective mens rea 68 requires that the accused have intended the consequences of actions. Even knowing those consequences, they still proceeded. The me
More Less

Related notes for LY205

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit