Class Notes (839,116)
Canada (511,194)
Philosophy (392)
PP110 (101)
Lecture

philosophy lecture 1.docx

3 Pages
96 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
PP110
Professor
Hugh R Alcock

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Description
 Argumentation in philosophy  the philosopher is above all someone who tests the reasonableness of beliefs especially those concerning vexing questions, eg. What makes a person’s actions right or wrong?  Insofar as such questions are difficult the philosopher relies on her reasoning to try to answer them. And to reason is to argue. Argumentation is therefore at the core of philosophical practice.  An argument (to paraphrase Monty Python) can be defined as: an intellectual process which consists in a series of statements intended to establish a definite proposition (claim). In other words, it is a set of premises aimed to support a particular conclusion.  Deduction: to say that one claim, r, is deduced from some others, eg. p and q, is to say that if we hold p and q true then r must also be accepted as true, that is, one is rationally obliged to accept r as true.  Deduction is all or nothing in the sense that one has no choice but to accept that the conclusion is true if one accepts that the premises are true, so long, that is, as the argument is valid.  Validity- an argument is valid when its conclusion must follow from its premises. However, the conclusion of a valid argument does not have to be true. Validity is only a measure of the argument’s logical virtue.  Consider the following 2 valid arguments: 1st. Either the Eiffel tower is in London or it is in Paris 2nd. The Eiffel tower is not in London 3rd. Therefore, the Eiffel tower is in Paris.  For the argument, the conclusion is validly inferred from the premises. Again, so long as the premises of a valid argument are true its conclusion will have to be true.  Any good argument has to be valid, otherwise we are not rationally obliged to accept the conclusion even when its premises are true. Ex of an invalid argument: 1. Henry is a Martian, then he is under 1m tall 2. Henry is not a Martian 3. Henry is over 1m tall. There are a variety of ways to argue. The most common are: 1. Argument by deduction 2. Argument by experience 3. Argument by analogy 4. Inference to the best explanation 5. Argument by reductio ad absurdum 1. Argument by deduction: Sherlocke holmes is probably the most famous non existent practitioner of his style of argument. For example, he deduces that violet smith is a cyclist because the bottom of her shoes are worn in a way that is invariably caused by pedaling. The argument is: 1. All marks of type m on a shoe are caus
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit