Class Notes (836,563)
Canada (509,855)
Philosophy (392)
PP233 (17)
Lecture

Sexual Perversions Lecture

3 Pages
107 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PP233
Professor
Mary Anne Banks
Semester
Summer

Description
Sexual Perversions o Paraphilias: a condition in which a person’s sexual arousal and gratification depends on fantasizing about and engaging in sexual behavior that is atypical and extreme o Most common are:  Pedophilia  Exhibitionism  Voyeurism  Frotterism  Fetishism Nagel – ‘Sexual Perversions’ 1. Romeo sees Juliet, he is aroused. 2. Juliet sees Romeo, she is aroused. Further, Romeo notices Juliet’s arousal and is further interested. 3. Romeo follows Juliet’s gaze and realizes she is aroused by him (embodiment) 4. Juliet sees Romeo looking at her. He is now aroused by her arousal of being seen by him. 5. Move to the physical level. General Conditions to not be a case of Perversion 1. Must sense the other 2. The other must sense you 3. You must sense the other sensing you 4. The other senses you sensing them  Ongoing reciprocal sexual perceptions and embodiment of the other and oneself  Sexual deviation: Incomplete versions of sexual arousal and interaction; they are perversions of the central impulse  For example:  Sex with objects – not alive  Sex with children/animals – alive but no reciprocity  Sadism – retention of control impedes awareness of self as object  Masochism – can only experience being an object Sexual Perversion? 1. Elaborations of the sexual act (anal, oral) – not a perversion. 2. Sex with multiple partners – leads to exhibitionism and voyeurism, which are incomplete. Could be a perversion. 3. Homosexuality – not a perversion. Is Sexual Perversion Wrong? o It affects the quality of the experience, but all sexuality exists on a spectrum. o Further, while perverted sex is “incomplete” it could be more physically enjoyable. o Having “bad” sex (perverted sex) might be better than having no sex at all. Homosexuality o Two sexual partners of the same biological sex. o Ruse:  Two main arguments 1. Homosexuality is unethical  Immanuel Kant – “We must treat each other (and ourselves) as an end and never simply as a means.”  Kant uses the notion of criminal carnis (the abuse of one’s sexuality)  Contrary to reason = adultery  Contrary to our nature = masturbation, bestiality, homosexuality  Ruse counters this by saying it is mutually beneficial. 2. Homosexuality is unnatural  Distinguishes between homosexual orientation (no choice) and homosexual activity (choice)  The natural function of sexual activity is to reproduce. Any sexual act that does not have this as its aim is a perversion.
More Less

Related notes for PP233

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit