Class Notes (836,147)
Canada (509,656)
Psychology (2,794)
PS260 (110)
Lecture

Chapter 3 Part 2.docx

6 Pages
118 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PS260
Professor
Carolyn Ensley
Semester
Fall

Description
Class 3, Lecture 5, Chapter 3: Recognizing Objects Feature Nets  McClelland and Rumelhart‟s (1981) model of word recognition included two additions: o Excitatory and inhibitory connections between detectors.  Inhibitory connects occur if one letter is detected it might excite letters that are common in the bigram for it and inhibit those that are not.  Certain letter combinations are more commonly seen. o Top-down connections from words to letters and letters to features.  Once the features of a letter are presented, the features not included are ignored.  You can have activation going to from the word level to the letter level to the feature level.  This is the reason why we can read text where the words are jumbled, es are changed to 3s, upside down text.  Similar feature nets may underlie our perception of objects.  The recognition by components (RBC) model includes an intermediate layer that is sensitive to geons, basic shapes proposed as the building blocks for all three- dimensional forms. o When we see a certain combination of geons we identify a certain object as being said object.  One piece of evidence supporting the representation of geons is that perceptually degraded pictures are better recognized if geons are preserved o When you take away the geons, individuals are less likely to know what the object is when distortion occurs  The object-superiority effect is analogous to the word-superiority effect.  Lines are perceived more accurately if presented in the context of an object. o the position of them on the screen o Getting a deeper recognition of objects when we see it as being part of a geon  Models of object recognition differ on whether object recognition depends on viewpoint. o In the recognition by components model, geons result in viewpoint- independent recognition.  Does not matter what side you see the object from you will be able to recognize the object. Do not mentally rotate anything to recognize the object.  Response should have quicker response time o Other proposals are viewpoint-dependent, requiring the remembered representation to be “rotated” into alignment with the current view.  Require more of a matching, see something and search our memory for something that matches it.  The more the object has to be rotated, the longer it takes to recognize. Different Objects, Different Recognition Systems?  Some evidence suggests that certain categories of objects are perceived using specialized mechanisms. o Not all objects are necessarily recognized using the same process  In particular, the recognition of faces may involve principles different from those discussed thus far. o Fusaform area where the face recognition occurs  One source of evidence for specialized face-processing mechanisms comes from prosopagnosia, a type of agnosia in which the visual object-recognition deficit is specific to faces. o Agnosia = the inability to recognize an object o Prosopagnosia = the inability to recognize faces o The fact that you can lose the inability to recognize faces but not objects indicates that the idea that there i
More Less

Related notes for PS260

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit