Class Notes (837,612)
Canada (510,370)
York University (35,409)
Anthropology (639)
ANTH 2170 (47)
Lecture

ANTH 2170 - Lecture - January 17th, 2013.docx

4 Pages
156 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Anthropology
Course
ANTH 2170
Professor
Sonja Mac Donald
Semester
Winter

Description
ANTH 2170 Lecture January 17 , 2013 Brief History of Anthropology The study of humanity across time and space  Arm-chair anthropology  Early anthropology dominated by physical evolutionary perspective  Anthropometric studies  Louis Henry Morgan – social evolutionism --  Great deal of human diversity, this became a curious question to the public and a social policy question  People needed to make sense of the land and the inhabitants  There was a lot of cultural, political and social concerns with regards to non-whites and white inhabitants  Natural historians (biological diversity, geographical data, etc)  Anthro domain studies the nature of human beings o Tried to find answers to the differences of hierarchy, and social actions – this was the first through and domain that was encountered in anthropology o How can you explain the differences in which people behave, what are the proper behaviours of men and women, how can this be explained  Prior to the 1800’s = pre scientific era o How can racial and other factors be explained o The world was considered god’s creation, not a part of evolition o Science and religion weren’t different identities at the time  After the acceptance of science the questions of human diversity became a more scienfitic endeavour  Armchair anthropologist o First kinds of anthropologists – scholars, medical doctors, sat in their studies in England and Belgium, etc, and studied o They never met the people that they studied o The distance created a lack of understanding o They had a moral hierarchy over others in terms of their findings – knowledge superiority o European society as superior and that everyone is measured against them o This was considered the evolutionary perspective  Evolutionary perspective o Idea of hierarchy, European man was on top, the idea that you could rank other races based on European dominance o This fit well with the doctrine of creationism (God) o This was advantageous for colonial power to think of others as lesser then human kind o Some thought that non Europeans were not considered humans o Darwin – survival of the fittest, adaptation, reproduce the most successfully  Anthropometric studies o Great age of classification o Classifying by characteristics ANTH 2170 Lecture January 17 , 2013 o Anthropologists attempting to understand racial differences – they used this same concept o Once classified you tend to get hierarchal classification o Anthropometric: measuring humans, measuring human body parts and using that to classify people – as if measuring your body could tell someone how intelligent, criminally active, sexuality etc..  Louis Henry Morgan – social evolutionism o Father of American cultural anthropology o Trained as a lawyer, and has a great interest in social anthropology o He was a good guy – (LINKED WITH ARTICLES FOR THIS WEEK) o He disagreed with races as hierarchal different o He wanted to show that the Iroquois (whom he devoted a lot of time being involved and advocating for) o There is social evolution – primitive  civilized – (savagery, barbarism, civilization) – commenting on the fundamental rightness of the way in which people live their lives – he was trying to be helpful and say that this is what anthropology should study o He said that nature intended for everyone to reach civilization, but some didn’t make it there, and that those people can be helped to be socially evolved o What makes common sense – this gets projected onto this model and thus internalized o He believed that evolution was a slow process and that it also begins to be tied into different kinds of interventions that these dominant societies make against the primitive societies o What are the consequences of this kind of scientific thinking? o What should be done about the lower people on the scale such as indigenous people?  He thought that the dominant society should help bring them up to their level, and solve the problem of their primitiveness – mixing the two populations  I.E. residential schooling (SOCI 3630)  Assimilation  Problematic idea o The idea of the primitive other becomes prominent in European thinking o What are the implications of this mode of thinking?  It was convenient for nations that were dominating, and absorbed lesser regions  Canada was a fertile new land, new conquered territories benefited from these ways of thinking  Science has been used to justify the dominant views of today – benefited the dominant societies in terms of agriculture, technological and industrial progress o Who is to say w
More Less

Related notes for ANTH 2170

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit