Class Notes (836,580)
Canada (509,856)
York University (35,328)
Anthropology (639)
ANTH 2170 (47)
all (8)
Lecture

reading notes_.docx

4 Pages
113 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Anthropology
Course
ANTH 2170
Professor
All Professors
Semester
Winter

Description
Sex, Gender and the Body: Cross-Cultural Approaches to the Body, Gender, Sexuality and Kinship ANTH2170 – Fall/Winter 2011/2012 – Karen McGarry Reading – The Trouble with Nature: Sex in Science and Popular Culture – Sept 21 In the Beginning, Nature - Lucien Herr’s aphorism expresses a partial and provisional truth: We do not ‘posit’ the world around us. We encounter it. So much is self-evident. o Example: There is a sea, and it is really there and has been from time immemorial, independent of any human intentions, but all good reasoning suggests that it was experienced differently by the medieval fishermen who populated it with monsters then by the modern romantic vacationing on a cruise liner. o Example: The sun holds us, too, in its regard, but whether we know it as God’s first light or as a burning ball of hydrogen, we cannot quite see it the same way as the Aztecs or the Norse did. - Not even the most universal occurrences give rise to any clear consensus about the ‘nature’ of nature or what might constitute its ‘firstness’. - It will seem self-evident that nature (as in ‘human nature’) is somehow allied with the body (as against the mind, and all that is conscious and volitional). - As Carol MacCormack and Marilyn Strathern meticulously show in their classic collection of essays ‘Nature, Culture and Gender’, not every culture asserts a continuous line of demarcation between nature and culture, mind and body, and the other familiar dualisms. o Not every culture gives place to the singular and unitary concept, ‘nature’. And even in modern, Western cultures, nature’s place is by no means stationary or unchanging. The Natural Body - In making claims about nature, modern Western people often point to the self- evidence of the body, its firstness, and the ground it undeniably provides for both thought and activity. - Santeros in New York City sometimes insist that there is a hole in the top of the head, an aperture opened up by Yoruba orishas during spirit-possession rituals. - More than one culture has projected its social preoccupations as fantastic body parts: the ‘wandering uteri of early modern medicine, fothinstance, or that magical substance testosterone, mythologized in so much 20 century folk medicine. - By the very nature of their existence, nothing is actually self-evident about what will be seen as self-evident in the nature of the body. And often, what seems so self-evident about the experience of the body belongs to history, not nature. - For thousands of years, the genitalia of men and women were each construed as variations on an essentially ‘phallic’ theme – the man’s parts turning outward, the woman’s turning inward. But in 18 century medicine, an astonishing metamorphosis occurred. Male and female bodies took shape as complementary antitheses, each radically different from the other, the one concave where the other was convex. Men and women became ‘opposites’ – and not just that, but ‘opposites’ held to ‘attract’ each other. o As counterintuitive a scheme as any ever devised, true heterosexuality thus was conceived (if not quite yet ‘born’) and we, its heirs, are at pains to see bodies differently. - First and second principles, then, for a social history of nature: o Nature, even in it’s ‘firstness’ is in no small part what we make of it – if we make anything of it at all. o Inasmuch as knowing and doing are linked, what we see in nature, in the world, and in human bodies in very much caught up in questions of a social and political order – that is, in what we want to see. Heterosexual by Design - The perception of bodies is nowhere more saturated with cultural meanings than around the question of sexual practices, where some are still seen as ‘natural’ and other’s as ‘unnatural’. - Nowhere is the discourse of nature more resonant with practical, political implications than in those modern origins stories, models of biological evolution – our way of thinking about what it is that seems to confront us, ready-made, with a design of its own from the depth of the flesh. o This problematic ‘nature’ as visualized in a questionable ‘science’ is endlessly cited, invoked, and contested in struggles over the sense of the body and the meanings of sex. - Martha McCaughey summarizes the matter: “Anyone questioning the natural and therefore privileged status of
More Less

Related notes for ANTH 2170

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit