Class Notes (836,589)
Canada (509,861)
York University (35,328)
Criminology (771)
CRIM 1650 (223)
Lecture 8

CRIM 1650 Lecture 8: Gender and Crime (part 1)
Premium

8 Pages
19 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Criminology
Course
CRIM 1650
Professor
James Williams
Semester
Fall

Description
Gender ad Crime (Part 1) – Crime and Social Status (Week 9 – Nov. 8) Linden ch. 6 + course kit – “The New Bad Girl” Last Week: Gender and Crime (Part 1): The Female Offender  Crimes committed by women and the unique reason they commit crime relative to men  Approximately 80% of all crime are committed by men  Objectives: the image, evidence (profiles), explaining female offending, female offending and violence against women The Image: Perceptions of Female Criminality  “Nasty” girls and “unruly” women o idea produced through the media o because it is uncommon is attracts media attention o portrayal of female aggression – nasty, unruly, bad  men are described as violent or aggressive o Importance of language being used to describe female offenders  Ex. Nasty – far from neutral, judgemental, deviation from accepted norms of stereotypical women  When acts of violence occur (by women) it is viewed as unnatural/ straying away from ideal/stereotypical women  public perceptions o rates of female crime are on the rise  women are becoming more violent and it is more common o women, specifically young girls, are becoming more violent and aggressive o equalization of opportunities and the disappearance of the “gender gap”  as women become more liberated and integrated into the economic mainstream = becoming equally criminal  disappearance of gender gaps, between men and women  ex. Entry of women into the workforce = access to opportunities to commit white collar crimes  gender gap (female vs male offending) o crime committed by women seems to receive more media coverage  Ex. “Girls Gone Violent” – “The New Bad Girl” The Evidence: Profiles of Female Offending  Increasing rates of criminal behaviour on the part of girls and women and a narrowing of the “gender gap” o Women are responsible for a greater % of crime compared to men (all crime types) o Disappearance of the gender gap o Despite greater %, men continue to perpetrate more o Violent crime (male- 84%)  However, majority of female crimes are non-violent o Property crime, drug possession, fraud (welfare), minor forms of assault  Where majority of female offending occurs o Rareness of serious violent crime presented by women (murder, aggravated assault, robbery) – represent a small portion of female crime – exceedingly rare  Has gone unchanged since the 1960’s (stable) o Relative to boys, not as much violent crime has been reported o Homicide charges are credibly rare amongst girls – they represent 4.5% of youth charged with homicide offences  Homicide offences in youth are already credibly rare o When girls commit murder, they are much more likely to kill family members and kill because of interpersonal or family conflict, rather than a criminal incident  Murder by girls emerges out of particular family/interpersonal conflict – almost like self defense against what is already a violent situation o Increase in arrest rates are linked with common assault*  The rate which men are charged, has decrease since early 1990’s, whereas the rates for women has doubled since the 1990’s  Narrows the gap between # of females charged with violent crimes vs. males  Is the reaction to female offending increasing or is it a genuine increase?  Evidence of re-labelling and the discovery of “new” offences” o Crimes have been re-labelled of crime  Worthy of a new label and arrest o Ex. Altercations within the school (girl vs. girl) seen as interpersonal conflict  More recently, teachers have been viewing these actions as violent crime and worthy of reporting  Increase the rates of female violence o Disputes of confrontation between parent and child  A child can be charged for physical abuse if they hit their parents*  Parents are encouraged to report their children when necessary  Changes the idea of crime- increases crime (re-labelling) o Discovery of new *  ex.  Because of this mandate, police charge both male and female in common assault, increasing crime rates o Suggests we need to be skeptical that violence by women is genuinely increasing  Using a critical lens, we need to appreciate the complex dynamics that contribute to the production of these cases  Women and the “War on Drugs” o Significant increase in arrest and charge for women involved with drugs / trade o Women often occupy a vulnerable position within drug trade hierarchy  Given the responsibility to be the mules – transport drugs (risky, illegal = charge of a crime/criminalized) o Gender inequality in the drug trade  Women as victims o Women who engage in serious forms of violence often have histories of abuse and prior episodes of being victims  There is a close connection between the status of women as offenders and victims o To understand the format, we need to appreciate and understand the latter Explaining Female Offending  Why do women engage in crime?  Very little attention to why women engage in crime o Strain theory, etc are able to explain this equal to men  Lombroso (1900): Masculinity Thesis o Theory of female offending o Women who committed crime were equally as masculine as males o Consists of three parts:  1. Fewer female criminal’s b/c women, by nature, are more primitive and less intelligent than men, believed to be naturally passive and conservative  2. If women did commit crime – reasoned that those actions are due to the fact that they possess masculine traits  biological makeup similar to men  3. Female criminals are masculine, b/c they are masculine, they are biologically abnormal – a departure from nature o suggests a form of female criminality that was inherently threatening and dangerous o (Lombroso cited in Heidensohn, 1996: 144) o (Lombroso, 1900: 151)  female criminals are viewed as unnatural therefore viewed as more dangerous than male offenders  Pollack (1961): The Criminality of Women o Developed two prong theory o 1. Addresses the causes of female offending  Pollack observes that women tend to commit specific types of crime  Ex. Fraud, forgery, embezzlement, prostitution  Reasoned: they all include some kind of deception and persuation  Therefore, these types of crime are best explained as the deceitful, cunning, manipulative personality traits of women (women, by nature, are deceitful and its reflected in these types of crime)  Then asserted that deceitfulness was a biological trait  Ability to fake orgasms? - manipulation  Further argued that menstruation, pregnancy were dangerous times for women b/c it makes them more prone to commit criminal acts  Biology plays a fundamental role in understanding female crime o 2. The failure of the criminal justice system to take female offending seriously  the chivalry thesis: acknowledging women committing various types of crime  reasoned that they weren’t being reported/charged/arrested b/c the chivalry of police, judges  willingness of authority to excuse female criminal behaviour – on the grounds that it was not completely criminal  female crime is much more common that what is recognized because it is not take seriously o sex rooted biologically vs. gender (social)  Adler and Simon (1975): Women’s L
More Less

Related notes for CRIM 1650

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit