Class Notes (806,814)
Canada (492,451)
York University (33,494)
Criminology (771)
CRIM 1650 (223)

Measurement of Crime.docx

7 Pages
Unlock Document

York University
CRIM 1650
James Williams

Measurement of Crime Links between Definition and Measurement: How crime is defined will invariably influence how it is measured. 1) Activities that are not defined as crimes will not be measured -Many white collar crimes aren’t in the criminal code and as such aren't measured as crimes -Death from cosmetic surgeries -(ex: one individual died as a result of complication of a liposuction in 2007; the cosmetic surgeon was not charged with crime but did lose her licence.) 2) The broader the definitions, the greater the amount of crime -The more you classify as a crime the more is viewed as criminal 3) The narrower the definition, the smaller the amount of crime Uniform Crime report (UCR) 1) Most commonly and widely reported crime statistic. 2) Compiled by Canadian Centre for Juice Statistics based on monthly reports from police forces across Canada. 3) Includes both crimes reported to the police, and the outcomes of police patrols and investigations. -Drugs are not in the criminal code, they have their own act and thus not included in these statistics. Youth crime is included in UCR 4) Crime Rate = 100,000/Population x Number of Incidents. 5) CRIME Severity Index (2009)  developed in 1960s, which is why usually all crime rate changes are recorded starting '62  each individual police force collects up their crime incidents and forwards them to the stats centers (compile them)  police must determine that an incident that is reported to them is indeed defined as a crime (this is distinct fr. Charges) ex: something can be reported as crime but no charges will be laid (an example of a case where no charges are laid is homicide)  not included in UCR : youth crime, traffic offences, military offences, crime committed by police officers (although debate exists if it would be considered a crime or just police axn), drug offences.  crime severity index: captures more serious forms of crime and therefore develops alternative measures. It is a weighting system so that more srs. Crimes carry higher rate. Includes: federal statutes (Incarceration Rate x Average Weight of Prison Sentence ) (he showed a crime severity index vs. Traditional crime rate graph) Limitations: 1) Reporting Practices(UMO) -Estimated that 4 /10 crimes will be reported to police -Highly reported crimes include: homicide, abduction, theft over $5000  this raises the question whether individuals have been victimized but simply did not report it to the police for reasons such as: it is not urgent, it could have been a small crime that is not worth reporting, it could be pride (you don’t want ppl to know you were victimized) or you are hesitant to report individuals to the police, not important enough, police couldn’t do anything, crimes have been perceived as a personal matter that don’t need to be reported.  Under-reporting is actually a severe issue and sexual assault (75-80%), domestic violence and fraud are the most under-reported.  Most reported: motor vehicle theft, household property, breaking & entering (ppl want to report for insurance purposes) (insurance claims)  crimes like homicide and suicide tend to be under-reported. (misclassified)  issues with over reporting (best ex: crimes involving younger ppl and crimes happening in school; teachers report a lot of incidents ( like school-yard fights, weapons being brought in school) 2) Law Enforcement Practices (DFODPEP)  Discretion; Whether its qualified for a crime  911 -> huge amount of discretion (discussions on whether calls are legitimate; only 25% of 911 calls are legit)  Belief that conviction is unlikely, not reported by officer  Filtering before officers are even involved  there are a number of diff. ways how police employ their resources that could increase crime rates  Organizational Objectives; police are sensitive to crime statistics.  Downgrading crimes  In New York, they tried to manipulate crime rate by downgrading crimes. (Assault only counted if it resulted in broken bones.)  Police may simply not report an incident  discussion on how police respond to calls  police may decide incident is not a crime and is too trivial and unimportant , this becomes a huge problem with things like sexual assault.  There are also incidents involving the question of whether conviction would be given, in other words why bother with the crime?  Enforcement and deployment of personality  crimes that are most sensitive to deployment practices are : drugs (even though drugs are not in the UCR), gang operations, violence against women, prostitution- related offences (who’s gonna call the police, theres no victim involved)  Pressures brought upon police deppts. To demonstrate police is doing a good job and can be manipulating through downgrading. To lower crime statistics  US and NYC – COMSTAT (designed to give popo a management tool to produce rates on diff. types of offences) Re-classifying a crime 3) Sensitivity to changes in legal definitions. -Mischief fires began to count as Arson, higher arson rates. (1991-1992) - sexual assault was given a new definition to make it more specific and as a result crime rates increased. 4) Patterns of “Offender” behaviour. -Offenders change their tactics -Theft, robbery (change in types of crimes committed) Crime Statistics: 1) Social construction of crime statistics -”Statistical facts are not merely the result of science and proper methodology. They are also a human, bureaucratic, organizational, and political achievement” (Haggerty. 2001:37) 2) Considerable “dark figure” of crime. -Total number of criminal offences that are unknown or unreported to the police & do not appear as part of the official crime rate. - It is significant b/c it suggests that UCR is limited in measuring crime 3) Use of alternative methods to better capture these dark figures of crime - criminologists have developed many ways such that they could capture the incidents that are not reported by the police Victimization surveys: 1) Phone surveys seeking info on victimization experiences of individuals over specific time periods 2) Questions relate to the incidence and characteristics of victimization experiences, as well as reason for reporting / not reporting the incident, fear of crime, and attitudes towards the police. 3) Alternate data source independent of police and citizen reporting practices 4) Surveys typically yield levels of crime higher than those reported in official statistics. -the time period is usually over the past 12 months (typically you have to be 15+ yrs old), you would get a call by phone and be asked if you were victimized by the following crimes : sexual assault, breaking and entering yadda yadda ... -they would also ask why they didn’t report it to police -this is valuable information because they provide an alternative data source that the police department exercises. -typically survey higher levels of crimes -higher reporting rate started to occur -UCR is useful as a trend over time Limitations: 1) Over-reporting  there are incidents that crime will be defined as a crime but is actually not (example, reporting a wallet stolen when it isn’t actually)  Telescoping; reportin
More Less

Related notes for CRIM 1650

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.