Gender Studies II
EN2012 – Winter 2011 – Terry Goldie
Reading – ‘Loving Men’ by Leo Bersani – Jan 19
- Recent feminist, Marxist, subalternist, gay and lesbian, and race studies, we
were reminded, ‘have helped expose the bigotry and intransigence of current
gender divisions,’ and the section on masculinity and representation – this one –
would, it was predicted, explore ‘the extent to which overt and sublimated images
of male domination and power are complicitous in the formation of sexist, racist,
classist and homophobic attitudes.’
- Task as authors would be to suggest how ‘these complacent representations of
masculinity [can] be subverted in order to refigure the balance of power in
- A gay man hardly be uninterested in the possibility of such subversions, and yet
there is a certain complacency in the assumption that it is unnecessary to
examine how we might be complicitous in the complacent representations of an
- It seems to me not entirely irrelevant also to explore what might be called the
erotic complicity of gay men in the very representations of masculinity that
- While it is indisputably true that sexuality is always being politicized, the ways in
which having sex politicizes are highly problematic.
- In his desires, however diverse they may be, and however many other
determinants help to constitute them, the gay man always runs the risk of
identifying with culturally dominant images of misogynous maleness.
- A more or less secret sympathy with heterosexual male misogyny carries with it
the narcissistically gratifying reward of confirming our membership in (and not
simply our erotic appetite for) the privileged male society.
- Same-sex desire includes the potential for a loving identification with the gay
- Our phantasmatic investments are frequently countered by more consciously and
more rationally elaborated modes of reaching out to others, such as liking our
admiring people we do not necessarily desire.
- In that tension lies an important moral dimension of our political engagements.
- The cultural constraints under which we operate include not only visible political
structures but also the phantasmatic processes by which we eroticize the real.
- Even if we are born straight or gay, we still have to learn to desire particular men
and women, and not to desire others; the economy of our sexual drives is a
- Perhaps nowhere are we manipulated more effectively and more insidiously than
in our most ‘personal’ choices or tastes in the objects of our desires.
- To seek to understand what might be called the line of constraint running from
one to the other is itself a political imperative.
- For a gay man, there may have been no time at which the object of his desire did
not include a socially determined and socially pervasive definition of what it
means to be a man. - An authentic, gay, male, political identity therefore implies a struggle not only
against definitions of maleness and of homosexuality as they are reiterated and
imposed in a heterosexist social disclosure, but also against those very same
definitions so seductively and so faithfully reflected by those very same
definitions so seductively and so faithfully reflected by those male bodies that we
carry within us as permanently renewable sources of excitement.
- Lesbians are an oppressed group sexually invested in an oppressed group.
- Gay men are an oppressed group not only sexually drawn to the power-holding
sex, but also belonging to it themselves.
- Feminists speak with distaste of our promiscuous male sexuality; African-
Americans accuse us of neglecting the crucial issues of class and race for such
luxuries are our ‘gay identity’.
- As white, middle-class, gay men, we are too much like our oppressors, which
means that, fundamentally, we can never be sufficiently oppressed.
- We are mortified if we are white and prosperous; and insofar as the ‘male ‘I’ has
enjoyed something of a psychic and cultural monopoly on subjectivity that needs
to be dissolved’, we will seek to be born again, this time ‘engendered’, as a
recent volume puts it, by feminism, in the anxious hope of ‘deconstructing’ our
repellently renascent male selves.
- Male homosexuality has always manifested itself socially as a highly specific
blend of conformism and transgression.
- For an impoverished African-American to conform is to embrace the racial and
economic injustices from which he or she suffers; for a woman, to conform is to
accept a heterosexist definition of female identity; for most gay men, to conform
is to pick up the privileges waiting for them as men.
- Nothing a woman agrees to do for the dominant culture will ever give her all the
privileges intrinsic in our society to maleness.
- The pressures of the double lives gay people have been forced to lead can of
course be enormous, but even those pressures are something of a luxury.
- If we can live with them, and if we do not get caught (and those ‘ifs’ should not be
minimized); the advantages are very gre