FACS 1900 Lecture Notes - Homeostasis, Advertising Campaign, Tim Hortons
45 views11 pages
FACS 1900 C
Arts and Ideas
Instructor: Robert Gill
Room: ACW 206 for lecture, ACE 006 for tutorial
Time: Friday 11:30 to 1:30 PM for lecture, 2:30 to 3:30 for tutorial
October 10, 2008
Today in tutorials there will be a sign up sheet to make sure you are all in the right
course, that sheet is for the faculty administration. You just initial it. If your name is not
on that sign-in sheet, beeline immediately to FACS office in 322 Goldfarb, they will get
you registered in the course.
Bringing articles to tutorials, something you were supposed to do to participate as fully as
possible in the tutorial. Have the material in hand so you can all participate meaningfully
in the conversation. Across the board we are using it as a participation factor. How much
you attended, how much you participated, it’s in your TAs hands to decide that. When
stuff comes up in the future, please come prepared to tutorials to do what we ask you to
do, it’s integral to your grade.
Today we will continue talking about language in relationship to a particular kind of
phenomenon in contemporary society, branding. Very pervasive form of culture today.
May not seem obvious to you at the moment. Two things we’re after, one you’ll have a
better understanding of the cultural, social dimension of language, how language works
as something that is social and cultural.
Number two, you should be able to discuss how branding is an example of language
being activated, being made real in contemporary life. Branding as an example of how
language works. We will look at this film No logo, based on materials by Naomi Klein, a
big name in antiglobalization politics.
In the film Naomi Klein will never say to you, my film is about the relationship between
language and branding. Actively today as a class we will watch the material and figure
out how we can relate it to what we’ve looked at about language in Hall, in other
readings, in tutorials.
Last time I left off with a long sentence starting with, “the problem with the idea that
language simply operates as a reflection or a window…” Hall talks about the importance
of the constructionist approach, understanding language from a constructionist
Although sometimes language does reflect a certain reality and is a window you can see
through, ultimately we want to get you to see that language is the medium through which
we are constantly constructing the reality around us. There is a reality out there, there are
irresponsible people bankrupting our society, these things are real. But Hall is saying that
that reality is only real in a sense that we understand it in a particular way. George Bush
take on today’s reality is his way to do things. What is real is always up to interpretation.
That seems straightforward enough but you need to see that all kind of categories we take
for granted in our life, that we call commonsense, are also socially constructed. How
gender and sexuality are socially constructed. How classrooms are spaces that socially
Today we start from this idea that an image, a sound doesn’t just represent reality, it
constructs reality. Seeing language as simply a reflection on something, a window on
something, this sets up an opposition between the viewer/reader and the message. We
want to come up with a way of understanding that language is something we are very
much inside of. We don’t want to understand language as simply an instrument, as a tool
we pick up and put down whenever we want. The tools are integral to our experience.
Marx observed that humans have a way of creating things and then forgetting that they
created them and beginning to see them as natural, as normal. We produce the world
around us and then we forget that we produced it. We can blame nature, the gods, for a
reality that we have constructed. Language is not something that is just there, outside of
ourselves, it is integral to our experience and to who we are.
An object like this Nike shoe, how could we apply this concept of representation to it? As
part of this chain of representation that Hall talks about. Part of the circuit of culture.
How we can begin to understand this. Explain a Nike running shoe as part of the circuit
of culture, where would you start to explain how this image on the screen can be
---the brand is apparent.
We will be looking at this things not just as a running shoe but as having a cultural, social
dimension to it, the brand that is connected to this thing. What is a brand?
---an overall concept we associate with certain things.
---how we classify a bunch of things created by one company. We have Nike as being
sporty and sleek, helping you to be more athletic.
It also has some other qualities to it, that we associate with the object. What kinds?
You have to have the money to buy it. What other qualities that are part of the brand?
---popularity and durability.
Popularity is a good one. Durability is more a quality of the item itself. I’m not talking
about the running shoe but about the brand.
---the phrase associated with it, just do it.
What is the quality of that slogan? Nike does not want you to know how the shoe is made
---celebrity endorsements, what the shoe represents to the masses.
The Nike executives have a certain understanding of how the brand is perceived, that is
part of the brand.
---the brand has to be in right now and able to be a temporary thing that will lead, others
will want to have it at that moment. Make it something you can’t really grasp.
You can grasp it to a certain extent but you don’t think much about it. It’s something a bit
intangible. It has to have a certain moment-ness, it has to be hip, contemporary. If this
shoe makes you think of five years ago, the brand is exhausted, is no longer effective.
The brand has to be both hip and current, to project a quality of belonging and happiness.
The brand has to make you feel a desire to buy the product. This is the most fundamental
thing about it. Be able to look at something that is very obvious and be able to explain
how it works. Tell us more than just that they’re good running shoes and they’re cool, or
Nike running shoes work and Nike can sell them because the brand connects the object to
a desire for that object. There is an object called a running shoe, there is a social process
and there is a meaning derived from that process. You are beginning to pick up a
language that you can use to start describing the social and cultural life of things.
For about 20 minutes I will show you some of this Naomi Klein video and have a
discussion of what we saw, how can we understand the social and linguistic dimensions
•Brands have become about selling an idea, a lifestyle. They are also an assault on
public life through sponsorship.
•Brands actually promote less choice, not more, due to corporate globalization.
The quality of work is going down and many jobs are disappearing.
•The three section of the video segment are called No space, No choice, No jobs.
The title No logo describes the spirit of anticorporate resistance
Room: acw 206 for lecture, ace 006 for tutorial. Time: friday 11:30 to 1:30 pm for lecture, 2:30 to 3:30 for tutorial. Today in tutorials there will be a sign up sheet to make sure you are all in the right course, that sheet is for the faculty administration. If your name is not on that sign-in sheet, beeline immediately to facs office in 322 goldfarb, they will get you registered in the course. Bringing articles to tutorials, something you were supposed to do to participate as fully as possible in the tutorial. Have the material in hand so you can all participate meaningfully in the conversation. Across the board we are using it as a participation factor. How much you attended, how much you participated, it"s in your tas hands to decide that. When stuff comes up in the future, please come prepared to tutorials to do what we ask you to do, it"s integral to your grade.