Class Notes (835,243)
Canada (509,044)
York University (35,229)
HREQ 2010 (80)
Lecture 20

HREQ 2010 Lecture 20: March 20
Premium

4 Pages
34 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Human Rights and Equity Studies
Course
HREQ 2010
Professor
Paul Brienza
Semester
Fall

Description
Rwanda and the World Community: -failure of the global community -the world community did not respond to the Rwandan genocide until the genocide was over and the goals of the genocide committers had been achieved Historical Background: -South Central Africa -its history and context leading up to the genocide are things very few people know about -thus, when the genocide occurred, there is a danger of interpreting the genocide as a unimaginable horror that was caused by savage behaviour -the roots of the genocide are to be found in the antagonistic relationship between two ethnic groups—the Tutsi and the Hutu -this ethnic division extends long into the past, but there was a perception that the Tutsi were not considered to be Natives of the area -the premise was that they may have migrated from the ‘horn of Africa’—or East Africa (include Ethiopia, Somalia, etc.) -the belief is that the Tutsi migrated from this part of Africa to the Rwandan nation -there is no real evidence for this -however, in terms of appearance, the Tutsis had a distinct look, as they resembled those from the Horn of Africa (there is a sense of physiognomic and ethnic difference) -the colonizers noticed this difference -for most the period leading up to European colonialism, the country was ruled by a Tutsi minority through a monarchical system (dynasty of Tutsi rulers) -the German colonizers applied ‘race theory’ to the country by claiming that the Tutsi were a ‘superior race’ in comparison to the Hutu within the context of that region of Africa -this kind of superiority was shown by the fact that the Tutsis ruled over the majority, the Hutus, who were slightly different in terms of their language group -this perception gained prominence -this convenient language of race was applied to the context of Africa (introduction of scientific racism by the Europeans) -they key element of racial theory is that there is a hierarchy of races (ranking system of races) -in that context, it serves various purposes -on the one hand, it serves the purpose of giving the European colonizers an ally (10-20% of the population was Tutsi: minority ruling group became associated with the colonizing forces of the Germans) -after the First World War, the colony was given to Belgium as a protectorate -the Belgians applied this scientific theory of race method, which intended to divide and conquer (use the minority to rule a majority) -this idea of difference was consistently driven by the European colonizers as a means of controlling the majority population) -the land was given to this minority population -the Belgians further enhanced the division between the tribes by mandating separate ID cards -2 major ethnic groups: everyone had to identify their ethnicity within the colonial Belgian context, thus these identities became more ingrained -European colonization for the majority of the Africa involved drawing boundaries on the map -many of the present-day borders were drawn by European colonial powers, which was not to reflect the ethnic tribal distinctions that exist in Africa, but rather, reflect the interests of the colonial powers -colonial rule, in essence, created ethnic separation and led to the two groups developing an intense hatred for each other -the Tutsis believed that they were superior given their relationship with the colonizers and gained a lot of the wealth -in contrast, because they reaped the benefits, the Hutus despised them -there was a conceived and perceived distinction between these two groups -when Belgian rule ended, much of the land and power were in the hands of the Tutsi while the Hutu were put in positions of forced labor -the colonial strategy was a classic tactic of ‘divide and conquer’ -although this marked the end of colonialism, there still exists an indicator of that colonial past (in the sense that the Tutsis are in political power and possess a majority of the land) -the fates and cultures of Rwanda and neighboring Burundi have always been closely linked -in 1972 there were mass killings of Hutu, which were carried out by a government and army controlled by the Tutsi -genocide in this particular case did not exist in merely 1 way or was not perpetrated by 1 side: there is this reciprocal relationship in the case of Rwanda -the use of the identity card continued until the post-colonial era -in the 1980’s many Tutsi refugees in Uganda were involved in trying to invade Rwanda and re- establish their ethnic dominance: by the time of the late 1970s, the Hutu majority becomes the majority in power, as they claim power -the Tutsis thus became an endangered minority and flee into the neighbouring countries -creation of an ideology: that ideology created from the Tutsi side extends back to the colonial era -however, from the Hutu side we see the emergence and development of an ideology that begins to assert its dominance -Hassan Ngeze published a text called the Hutu Ten Commandments which famously said, “The Hutu should stop having mercy on the Tutsi”: in this political grouping, they begin to see the Hutu majority or the vast majority of Rwanda as being too lenient with the Tutsi minority (they have taken
More Less

Related notes for HREQ 2010

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit