Class Notes (836,321)
Canada (509,732)
York University (35,328)
MODR 1760 (136)
Lecture 2

Lecture 2.docx

6 Pages
173 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Modes Of Reasoning
Course
MODR 1760
Professor
Hilary Davis
Semester
Winter

Description
Fallacies 15/09/2011 10:31:00 AM Truth  Whether or not premises and conclusions correspond to fact Validity  Relationship of the premises to the conclusion  Whether reasoning makes sense Soundness  When premises are true and conclusion validly derived from them  Conclusion is the logical consequence of the premise o All men are mortal o Socrates is a man o Therefore, Socrates is mortal Unsound arguments  True premises but invalid connection to conclusion o Just because “a” is “b” and “c” is “b”, does not make “a” “b”  Valid reasoning but untrue premise o All dogs are ferocious o Tom has a dog, Shaggy o Therefore, Shaggy is ferocious  Untrue premise and invalid reasoning o I like this course o All final exams are easy o Therefore, I will receive a high grade in this course Necessity and Sufficiency  When evaluating an argument, ask yourself if the premises are necessarily true o Do both premises both have to be there for an argument to be true?  Are premises sufficient to prove the conclusion o Is there enough evidence? Evaluating Arguments  Interested in whether an argument is sound: o Are premises true or acceptable to a reasonable person? o Is the reasoning to arrive at the conclusion valid?  Not interested in o Clarity, elegance, persuasiveness, or economy of style  Do not be opinionative  We do not need to know if conclusion is true Fallacies  Illusion of a good argument  Must be explained, not simply identified  Even when an argument is contains fallacies, the conclusion may be true 1. Appeal to Force or Threat of Force (Appeal to Fear)  instead of using reasons this fallacy threatens to use force to get another to do something or accept an idea 2. Appeal to Emotion  persuade us by manipulating our emotions/desires o emotions usually irrelevant to issue  Appeal to Pity  Appeal to Fear  Appeal to Guilt or Shame  Appeal to Flattery 3. Ad Hominem (“To the man”)  the person, mostly their character, is attacked  even someone of poor character can produce a good argument o Abusive Ad Hominem (Mudslinging)  Opponent is insulted or abused (attacks person)  Very effective because no one will trust the attacked o Circumstantial ad Hominem (Vested Interest)  Accusing opponent of a biased argument  Arguing that opponent has something to gain from their own argument  Fo
More Less

Related notes for MODR 1760

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit