Class Notes (835,108)
Canada (508,934)
York University (35,180)
Natural Science (2,813)
NATS 1760 (135)
Lecture

NATS 1760(DURANT)- Science, Technology & Citizenship 2: Experts.docx

3 Pages
115 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Natural Science
Course
NATS 1760
Professor
Darrin Durant
Semester
Fall

Description
SC NATS 1760 DARRIN DURANT/ JAMES ELWICK Monday, September 24, 2012 Science, Technology, and Citizenship 2: Experts  Experts are under thread of the general public- more/ less, experts/publics  should be a cooperation between experts and ordinary people WHY EXPERTISE?  We live in the age of specialism, highly political with a demand to make decisions and consensus operations  consensus is not the same as certainty - it does not mean we’ve reached certainty  “Science, if it can deliver truth, cannot deliver at the speed of politics”(pg. 23)  Publics are finding uncertainty as a problem, experts see uncertainty as continuing their research to reach certainty( the wrong standard or the wrong idea?)  pressuring science beyond its reach  THESIS: Collins & Evans  “… we ought to prefer the judgments of those who know what they are talking about.” (pg. 24) EXPERTISE REALIST VS. ATTRIBUTIONAL/ RELATIONAL REALIST( Collins & Evans)  expertise is a social process (language example)  a possession that you acquire  the refusal to recognize expertise is NOT the same as not having expertise ATTRIBUTIONAL/ RELATIONAL ( Kleimann)  language is not seen as an expertise if everyone can speak it  we use it when we criticize experts because of the biased judgment about an individual/ group of people  accepting/ rejecting experts ( Collins & Evans believe this doesn’t make sense- you have not lost something, the change is in the content)  expertise is attributed to you by others  the refusal to recognize expertise IS the same as not having expertise  it is rented to you and delegated to you COLLINS & EVANS VS. KLEIMAN COLLINS & EVANS  overcome the tensions between experts and democracy ( there is no “complete solution”, problem recurs in issues of “ how to understand the other”, e.g. anthropology, standpoint theory) KLEIMAN  overcome the tension between experts and democracy( increase citizen resources, address disparities and inequalities, citizen juries, improve expert collaboration with non- experts FOLK WISDOM  ordinary people are wiser than experts in the same technical areas ( pg. 6) - can know science by observing its surface? - Anthropologist can know natives without experience? - Politicians can know sham science better than scientis
More Less

Related notes for NATS 1760

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit