Class Notes (806,813)
Canada (492,450)
York University (33,494)
POLS 3561 (21)
Khooyashar (20)
Lecture 3

POLS 3651- Lecture 3.docx

3 Pages
Unlock Document

York University
Political Science
POLS 3561

POLS 3651/ MIST 3651  September 30th, 2013 Lecture 4 – Week 4 Racism and the Law Critical Theories of Race and Racism • Critical theories are better tools/ instruments to use when analyzing the issues of race and racism in Canada. • What is Critical Theory?  Critical Social Science: Critiques basic social structure. You may try to find the nature, foundation, and environments in these basic social structures. You are getting into the roots of “how” the structure works, who benefits from these structures, and who is at loss.  Critical Scholarship:  Interpretive Scholarship: the main cause of oppression  Criticism: bring about positive change by applying principals and values. Therefore: • Critical theory is based on this important premise that the conceptualization of race from a political perspective is vital for understanding the complexities of the politics of the state and the nature of society in the modern era. Why Political? Because of the emphasis on “oppression”. When you look at things politically it means that you are looking at things relationally. Critical Race Theory: • It is about studying (interpreting) and transforming (change) the relationship among race, racism, and power. In doing so, it shares many issues that with the civil rights and ethnic rights. Critical race theory tries to put the different approaches in a broader context and looking into these issues closely. - Unlike traditional civil rights, they focus on perpetual progress. Step by step progress. Critical Race Theory questions the very foundation of the liberal order including equality theory, legal reasoning, enlightment rationalism, and neutral principals of constitution law. In a liberal society, these are the main reasons in protecting and advancing rights. - Critical Race Theory tries to go beyond liberal reasoning and liberal rationality. Origins: • Critical race theory sprang up in the mid -1970’s. New theories and strategies were needed to combat the subtler forms of racism that were gaining ground. - Racism is being rolled back in a very complex way. • Critical race theory build on the insights of three previous movements:  Critical Legal Studies:  Radical Feminism:  Marxist Tradition: focusing on equality and opposing discrimination • It also draws from certain European andAmerican philosophers and theorists such asAntonio Granche, Doreda, Sojourner Truth, Fredrerick Douglas, Du Bois, and Martin Luther King. • The Frankfurt School of Critical Theory: The Frankfurt School’s studies combined Marxist analysis with Freudian psychoanalysis to form the basis of what became known as “critical theory”.  Methodological: Inter- Sectionality:  Different minorities feel racism and discrimination differently. - The Cross-effects of race, class, and gender with other social issues - Neutrality is inappropriate in terms of methodological. What is mainstream is that if anyone wants to study something, you have to be neutral about it. This theory says that you have plenty of theories, approaches, methodologies, and they are mainly there to oppress, and dominate. They are speaking to the needs of the oppressed, not the needs of the oppressed. Basic Tenets of Critical Race Theory: • From critical legal studies, they borrow the idea of legal indeterminacy. The idea that not every legal case has the same outcome. • They borrow from feminism insides, when they look into the relationship between power and the construction of social roles. In feminism they are distinguished among gender and sex. Gender is a social construction and sex is biological. Social construction is the construction of social roles. Who determines these social roles? Power relations, produce and reproduce gender relations. • One of the main issues behind gender issues – patriarchy • To look into the relationship between power and social roles, unseen, collection of patterns and habits that make up different types of domination. • So from the legal studies they borrowed the issue of “outcome”. Trying to understand constructional rol
More Less

Related notes for POLS 3561

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.