Class Notes (1,100,000)
CA (630,000)
York (40,000)
POLS (1,000)
POLS 2900 (100)

POLS 2900 Lecture Notes - On The Jewish Question, The Emotions, For Marx

Political Science
Course Code
POLS 2900
Stephen Newman

This preview shows half of the first page. to view the full 1 pages of the document.
POLS 2900
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
*Guest lecture by Jordan Cummings
On the Jewish Question
Jews could not be emancipated
Marx’s response: freeing the whole before freeing the particulars is putting the cart
before the horse. He purports that you need to have Jewish emancipation before you have
full-fledged emancipation.
There is difference between formal and substantive free will
oFormal freedom is better than unfreedom
oWhat Marx is trying to get at is the limitations and progress that came with the
French Revolution and its overall influence throughout Europe
Man is egoistic and self-centered in civil society. The emotions released by the
unfettering of markets were politically constituted.
Double freedom - free from bondage and free from common access to land and sell your
Marx views humans as social animals- and emancipation is to develop and work with our
sociality. We do not need for something to be above us. But, for this to take place, its
conditions of possibility have to work.
For Marx, religion is a form of alienation. It is projecting our powers into the sky.
The Jewish
The Jews were limited by their social context. There was little for them to do other than
be financiers.
Marx is writing about the Jew as a concept, not necessarily as a reality. He is not talking
about Jesus and the Pastor. He is talking about social relations. And so, in pre-capitalist
society, the Jews had few rights to being traders. The system was dependent on their
existence and dependent on their oppression. This was incredibly important to the entire
social order.
If Marx wrote right now, he would probably pick a different oppressed group and use
similar language to explain why we developed our oppressed stereotypes of that group
Protection of Private Property
Marx resonates with Locke’s idea that the state exists mostly to protect private property
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version